llvm/clang static analyzer reports

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Thu Oct 15 08:58:39 UTC 2020

On 15/10/2020 09:51, Maarten Hoes wrote:
> Just one more thing I need to mention. At some point during the 
> build/analysis, I run into the following:
> The analyzer (or make, I can't tell which) goes looking for 
> '/usr/bin/clang-10++' (which isn't there) instead of 
> '/usr/bin/clang++-10'. In other words, it looks for clang-version++ 
> instead of clang++-version. I haven't really investigated much, but 
> chose to be pragmatic and just add a symlink to work around the issue. 
> If this is an acceptable workaround, I'll add a README that mentions 
> this. On the other hand, if this is a dealbreaker and people want this 
> 'fixed' before continuing, then I am going to need a lot of help in 
> finding the root cause (so I can submit a bug report with the project 
> that causes the behaviour).

We can have a look once you have sent something to Gerrit.

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list