Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

[Rene Engelhard]

Hi,

Am 10.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
> Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I know are built for 
> Fedora releases; they go into category 2. 
Also in Debian
> Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I presume are built 
> for Debian releases (Rene, correct me if I'm wrong); they go into 
> category 3. 

Indeed.

> And then there are 3 implementations that are presumably in active use 
> elsewhere (Tor, wjh-la, Sakura286, correct me if I'm wrong); which go 
> into category 4. 

Or "active" development (for some values of active)

> That leaves 11 implementations that are presumably dead, in category 5.
>
> So if you know about any active use of any of those 11 implementations 
> in category 5 below, please report back here. Otherwise, the plan (to 
> be discussed in the ESC) is to eventually remove them in due course.

I believe people at Debian will scream here but I personally don't mind 
if those in category 5 are gone for good.

Regards,

Rene