Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)
rene at debian.org
Tue Jan 10 18:38:28 UTC 2023
Am 10.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
> Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I know are built for
> Fedora releases; they go into category 2.
Also in Debian
> Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I presume are built
> for Debian releases (Rene, correct me if I'm wrong); they go into
> category 3.
> And then there are 3 implementations that are presumably in active use
> elsewhere (Tor, wjh-la, Sakura286, correct me if I'm wrong); which go
> into category 4.
Or "active" development (for some values of active)
> That leaves 11 implementations that are presumably dead, in category 5.
> So if you know about any active use of any of those 11 implementations
> in category 5 below, please report back here. Otherwise, the plan (to
> be discussed in the ESC) is to eventually remove them in due course.
I believe people at Debian will scream here but I personally don't mind
if those in category 5 are gone for good.
More information about the LibreOffice