Official support for windows-arm64

[Sophia Schröder]

Hi Ilmary,

then I probably misunderstood the ESC minutes from 2024/02/29:

+ cmake find modules for SDK examples (Hossein)
       + Set of patches from Konstantin (WIP)
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/162978
       + Similar structure is needed for qmake
       + would this mean duplicated build systems for each example? 
(Miklos)
         + for each example, the maintenance would be low, hopefully 
(Hossein)
       + would be the goal to have old/cmake/qmake, 3 parallel build 
systems? (Miklos)
         + yes, for now (Hossein)
         + the cmake part for each example is small
       + smells like explosion of combinatorics (Stephan)
         + would be careful before going down that road
       + if the end goal is to settle down on cmake, love it (Thorsten)
         + but 3 in the long run is far from ideal.
       + cmake is not that exotic, we require it already for doxygen 
(Miklos)
         + which makes it supported on CI already (Thorsten)
       + if interested in doing the work + update the docs, then why 
not, as long as it's a single build system (Stephan)
         + but then do avoid qmake, and do switch over from gmake at the 
end
         + avoids the exploson


Sorry for the noise


Am 16.03.24 um 17:18 schrieb Ilmari Lauhakangas:
> On 16.3.2024 17.41, Sophia Schröder wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a side note from a community member:
>>
>> I don't know how much the hassle and the costs are,
>> but LibreOffice wants to switch to Cmake anyway.
>> (I saw Cmake mentioned at Linaro's webpage).
>
> There has been quite a lot of work toward building LibreOffice with 
> Meson. There has not been discussion about investing time into 
> building with CMake.
>
> Ilmari
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20240316/d5eac1e1/attachment.htm>