[Libva] [PATCH] Fix the issue in i965_UnlockSurface to lock it next time

[Gwenole Beauchesne]

Hi,

2012/10/19 ykzhao <yakui.zhao at intel.com>:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 07:19 -0600, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
>> From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao at intel.com>
>>
>> It uses the variable of locked_image_id to check whether one surface is locked
>> or not. But as the locked_image_id is not assigned correctly, it causes that
>> it can't lock one surface next time although it calls the vaUnlockSurfaces.
>
> Any comment about this patch?

I think you should move the assignment down after the "error:" clause
and s/error/end/ because otherwise, you wouldn't be able to lock a
surface again if an error occurred. Then, it should be fine.

Regards,
Gwenole.