[Lima] Difference to the blob / atomic modesetting

[Vasily Khoruzhick]

I don't think that feature diff exists.

lima dEQP results are on par with the blob.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:32 AM Thomas Rohloff <v10lator at myway.de> wrote:
>
> Thanks for this, will handle it to the CoreELEC devs as it seems atomic modesetting isn't working there.
> Now to the other question: Does anyone have a feature diff (between lima and the blob) at hand?
>
> 22.10.2020 13:31:59 Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On 22/10/2020 13:08, Thomas Rohloff wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I asked the CoreELEC devs for the (feature) differences between lima and the 4.9 blob driver with a highlight on atomic modesetting as it seems the blob doesn't use that. They told me to ask you directly, so I'm doing that in here.
> >
> > The atomic modesetting (by it's name) is the responsability of the Display Driver.
> >
> > The blob compiled for GBM, X11 or Wayland are used with an atomic modesetting DRM driver, we are running Kodi using the blob with the GBM or Wayland backend for a while now.
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >> I'm doing all this in the hope to get CoreELEC devs to switch from the 4.9 kernel to upstream, replacing the blob with Lima while doing so.>
> >> Thanks in advance for your replies,
> >> Thomas
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lima mailing list
> >> lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > lima mailing list
> > lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> >
> _______________________________________________
> lima mailing list
> lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima