[Lima] Difference to the blob / atomic modesetting

[Vasily Khoruzhick]

Well, you are pushing them for extra work and they don't see much
benefits in it.

I doubt they would argue a lot if you just send a pull request with
the changes you want.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Rohloff <v10lator at myway.de> wrote:
>
> Thank you, too.
>
> CoreELEC devs are starting to contradict their own statements (hell, one of them even said "we should not care (about the diff)" while another said "Lima is not feature complete enough"). It sounds like they evaluate Lima based on thoughts/feelings instead of facts, so hopefully they start to seriously think about Lima after reading this ( https://discourse.coreelec.org/t/blob-vs-lima/13242
> )
>
> 23.10.2020 00:28:20 Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul at gmail.com>:
>
> > I don't think that feature diff exists.
> >
> > lima dEQP results are on par with the blob.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:32 AM Thomas Rohloff <v10lator at myway.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for this, will handle it to the CoreELEC devs as it seems atomic modesetting isn't working there.
> >> Now to the other question: Does anyone have a feature diff (between lima and the blob) at hand?
> >>
> >> 22.10.2020 13:31:59 Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> On 22/10/2020 13:08, Thomas Rohloff wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> I asked the CoreELEC devs for the (feature) differences between lima and the 4.9 blob driver with a highlight on atomic modesetting as it seems the blob doesn't use that. They told me to ask you directly, so I'm doing that in here.
> >>>
> >>> The atomic modesetting (by it's name) is the responsability of the Display Driver.
> >>>
> >>> The blob compiled for GBM, X11 or Wayland are used with an atomic modesetting DRM driver, we are running Kodi using the blob with the GBM or Wayland backend for a while now.
> >>>
> >>> Neil
> >>>
> >>>> I'm doing all this in the hope to get CoreELEC devs to switch from the 4.9 kernel to upstream, replacing the blob with Lima while doing so.>
> >>>> Thanks in advance for your replies,
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> lima mailing list
> >>>> lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> >>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lima mailing list
> >>> lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lima mailing list
> >> lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> > _______________________________________________
> > lima mailing list
> > lima at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lima
> >