[Mesa-ci-intel] Regressions on staging/19.1
Clayton Craft
clayton.a.craft at intel.com
Mon Oct 14 17:54:49 UTC 2019
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
>
>Any news on this?
>
Sorry this took me a while, some other things came up that required my
attention and it took a while to pick through the results and figure out what
caused some of the failures.
Basically, I didn't find any regressions that I could blame on mesa. There are a
few unstable/flaky tests in the 19.1 branch, and I don't know why (I wasn't able
to bisect to any particular commit..). Since this is the last release for 19.1
and there are no obvious test regressions, I think it's OK to release from a
CI/regression perspective.
For completeness, I've included my notes/comments about failures I see on the
19.1 staging daily build below.
-Clayton
gen9 - glcts:
KHR-GL46.enhanced_layouts.varying_location_aliasing_with_mixed_auxiliary_storage
Test fixed with a newer GL CTS than what is used in the 19.1 staging
branch CI job
gen9/gen9 atom - piglit:
spec.intel_shader_atomic_float_minmax.execution.ssbo-atomiccompswap-float-negative-zero
spec.intel_shader_atomic_float_minmax.execution.ssbo-atomicmax-float-nan
spec.intel_shader_atomic_float_minmax.execution.ssbo-atomicmin-float-nan
These seems to be failures associated with piglit, they do not fail on
newer versions of piglit. I think they can be ignored for the 19.1
branch.
All platforms - crucible:
func.multiview.count_6.q0
func.multiview.count_6.masked_0_2.q0
func.multiview.count_6.masked_1_3_5.q0
func.multiview.count_6.masked_3_4.q0
These can be ignored. New tests added to crucible recently and CI was
erroneously using newer crucible builds (this has been corrected and
will be reflected in the next build)
g33/g965 - dEQP:
dEQP-EGL.functional.sharing.gles2.multithread.random.programs.link.7
dEQP-EGL.functional.sharing.gles2.multithread.simple.textures.teximage2d_copytexsubimage2d_render
dEQP-EGL.functional.render.multi_thread.gles2.rgba8888_pbuffer
These tests appear to be flaky on the 19.1 stable branch, I wasn't able
to blame any particular commit for it. I think they can be ignored
SNB - piglit:
piglit.spec.arb_texture_multisample.texelfetch.2-gs-usampler2dms
piglit.spec.glsl-1_50.execution.built-in-functions.gs-op-bitxor-abs-not-int-int
piglit.spec.glsl-1_50.execution.built-in-functions.gs-op-bitand-neg-abs-ivec4-int
These tests appear to be flaky on the 19.1 stable branch, I wasn't able
to blame any particular commit for it. I think they can be ignored
BSW - gl cts/dEQP/piglit:
dEQP-GLES3.functional.negative_api.texture.compressedteximage3d_invalid_astc_target
piglit.spec.!opengl 1_1.read-front clear-front-first samples=16 bsw m64
piglit.spec.arb_sample_shading.samplemask 16
piglit.spec.khr_texture_compression_astc.miptree-gles srgb-fp
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.begininvocationinterlock-inside-non-main-function_frag
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.endinvocationinterlock-inside-for_frag
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.endinvocationinterlock-inside-while_frag
piglit.spec.!opengl 1_1.read-front samples=16
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.begininvocationinterlock-inside-for_frag
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.begininvocationinterlock-inside-while_frag
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.endinvocationinterlock-before-begininvocationinterlock_frag
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_shader_interlock.compiler.endinvocationinterlock-inside-non-main-function_frag
KHR-NoContext.es32.robustness.lose_context_on_reset
KHR-NoContext.es32.robustness.readnpixels
KHR-NoContext.es32.robustness.no_reset_notification
KHR-NoContext.es32.context_flags.debug_flag_set_case
KHR-NoContext.es32.context_flags.robust_flag_set_case
KHR-NoContext.es32.context_flags.all_flags_set_case
These tests appear to be flaky on the 19.1 stable branch, I wasn't able
to blame any particular commit for it. I think they can be ignored. The
kernel on BSW systems in CI was recently updated to resolve some test
regressions on master, it's possible the test instability here is due to
the newer mainline kernel running on them...
gen9 atom - dEQP:
dEQP-GLES2.functional.shaders.texture_functions.vertex.texturecubelod
dEQP-GLES2.functional.shaders.fragdata.invalid_assign_to_1
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.filtering.linear_mipmap_linear_linear_mirror
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.wrap.mirror_mirror
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.wrap.clamp_clamp
dEQP-GLES2.functional.fbo.api.attachment_query_empty_fbo
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.texture_functions.texturelodoffset.usampler3d_vertex
dEQP-GLES3.functional.pbo.renderbuffer.rgb10_a2_triangles
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.mipmap.cube.basic.linear_nearest
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.mipmap.cube.projected.linear_nearest
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.mipmap.cube.bias.linear_nearest
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.filtering.linear_mipmap_linear_nearest_clamp
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.wrap.clamp_repeat
dEQP-GLES2.functional.fragment_ops.interaction.basic_shader.61
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.texture_functions.texturelodoffset.sampler3d_float_vertex
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.texture_functions.textureprojlodoffset.isampler3d_vertex
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.fragdata.draw_buffers
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.filtering.linear_mipmap_linear_linear_clamp
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.filtering.linear_mipmap_linear_nearest_mirror
dEQP-GLES2.functional.texture.vertex.cube.wrap.mirror_clamp
dEQP-GLES2.functional.negative_api.state.get_framebuffer_attachment_parameteriv
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.fragdata.invalid_assign_to_1
dEQP-GLES31.functional.tessellation.user_defined_io.negative.es32.per_vertex_incorrect_control_explicit_output_array_size_1
These seem to be flaky on 19.1.. I wasn't able to blame any particular
commit in the branch for the flakiness.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-ci-intel/attachments/20191014/4606d3bd/attachment.sig>
More information about the Mesa-ci-intel
mailing list