[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] configure.ac: remove redundant option --enable-gallium-egl

Marek Olšák maraeo at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 18:20:45 PDT 2011


On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Benjamin Franzke
>> <benjaminfranzke at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Removing this flag seems right to me, but always building the egl
>>> state tracker when gallium and egl is enabled not.
>>> So when --with-state-trackers is also removed, we'd need a new
>>> --with-egl-drivers=auto|gallium,dri2,glx or so.
>>
>> Isn't --with-egl-platforms good enough to select among fbdev, wayland,
>> one-day-maybe dri, ...? I don't see a reason for another option. You
>> can choose between dri and xlib (st/glx) already using
>> --with-driver=dri|xlib.
> OpenGL can be supported via both egl_dri2 and egl_gallium EGL drivers.
>  The former is generally preferred for various reasons.  However, when
> both drivers exist, there is no automatic way to make EGL chooses the
> former.  Thus it is desirable to be able to disable egl_gallium in the
> first place.

Why not to use egl_dri2 for all drivers, the classic and gallium ones?

Why not to build a single fully-replaceable binary for a driver, like
classic swrast_dri.so can be replaced by swrastg_dri.so from Gallium?
Like radeon_drv.so from xf86-video-ati can be replaced by r300_drv.so
from Gallium?

I thought it had been agreed long ago that Gallium is a private
unstable interface inside drivers and shouldn't be exposed publicly in
any way. With that, I see no reason for egl_gallium.so to exist.

Marek


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list