[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mesa: fix comments for RG formats
Brian Paul
brianp at vmware.com
Mon Nov 28 14:16:58 PST 2011
On 11/28/2011 12:24 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:17 -0700, Brian Paul<brianp at vmware.com> wrote:
>> The position of the red and green bits was misstated in the comments.
>> Arguably, the names of these formats should be changed to "GR" to reflect
>> the component ordering and to be consistent with other formats.
>
> Actually, could we get consistency in that naming? Or at least a
> comment for now here and in _mesa_format_matches_format_and_type(),
> where it's likely to get screwed up?
I'm happy to rename the formats later but I'm going to push the fixed
comment for the short term.
Looking at _mesa_format_matches_format_and_type() for RG88:
case MESA_FORMAT_RG88:
return format == GL_LUMINANCE_ALPHA && type == GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE
&& littleEndian;
I think that's wrong. Is GL_LUMINANCE_ALPHA somehow compatible with
GL_RG? I think the code should read:
case MESA_FORMAT_RG88:
return format == GL_RG && type == GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE && littleEndian;
-Brian
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list