[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] i965: Don't depth test the fake depthbuffer when one isn't present.

[Chad Versace]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/28/2011 10:48 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> For the non-separate-stencil-only case, we've been using a NULL
> surface for depth, so we didn't have to care.  However, to support
> separate stencil with no depthbuffer, we have to make the depth
> surface non-NULL or the stencil test always fails thanks to separate
> stencil inheriting the surface type of depth.
> 
> Fixes hiz-depth-stencil-test-d0-s8.


Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace at linux.intel.com>

- ----
Chad Versace
chad.versace at linux.intel.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=t5pX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----