[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 10/10] i965/msaa: Remove comment about falsely claiming to support MSAA.

Paul Berry stereotype441 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 24 10:39:26 PDT 2012


On 24 July 2012 10:15, Chad Versace <chad.versace at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 07/18/2012 08:15 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
> > Gen6+ hardware now supports MSAA properly.
> > ---
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c |    5 -----
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> > index f5c8b6e..9917741 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
> > @@ -154,11 +154,6 @@ brwCreateContext(int api,
> >     ctx->Const.MaxTransformFeedbackSeparateComponents =
> >        BRW_MAX_SOL_BINDINGS / BRW_MAX_SOL_BUFFERS;
> >
> > -   /* Claim to support 4 multisamples, even though we don't.  This is a
> > -    * requirement for GL 3.0 that we missed until the last minute.  Go
> ahead and
> > -    * claim the limit, so that usage of the 4 multisample-based API
> that is
> > -    * guaranteed in 3.0 succeeds, even though we only rasterize a
> single sample.
> > -    */
> >     if (intel->gen >= 6)
> >        ctx->Const.MaxSamples = 4;
> >
>
> I wonder how prevalent are such stale comments in our driver...
>
> Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <chad.versace at linux.intel.com
>
>
Thanks for all the review, Chad.  Were you planning on reviewing patch 4/10
as well?  It looks like that one got skipped.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20120724/4afd19c5/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list