[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 04/19] make: Drop HOST_CC and HOST_CFLAGS.

[Jakob Bornecrantz]

----- Original Message -----
> Except for the deleted linux-cell target, these were just the target
> cc/cflags.  The only usage was for gen_matypes, which wants the
> target's structure packing, not the host, anyway.
> ---
>  configs/default       |    2 --
>  src/mesa/x86/Makefile |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configs/default b/configs/default
> index 20ba796..bf67d34 100644
> --- a/configs/default
> +++ b/configs/default
> @@ -19,11 +19,9 @@ DRM_SOURCE_PATH=$(TOP)/../drm
>  # Compiler and flags
>  CC = cc
>  CXX = CC
> -HOST_CC = $(CC)
>  CFLAGS = -O
>  CXXFLAGS = -O
>  LDFLAGS =
> -HOST_CFLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
>  GLU_CFLAGS =
>  GLX_TLS = no
>  
> diff --git a/src/mesa/x86/Makefile b/src/mesa/x86/Makefile
> index 9716dc2..8107176 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/src/mesa/x86/Makefile
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ clean:
>  
>  
>  gen_matypes: gen_matypes.c
> -	$(HOST_CC) $(ARCH_FLAGS) $(INCLUDE_DIRS) $(HOST_CFLAGS) gen_matypes.c -o gen_matypes
> +	$(CC) $(ARCH_FLAGS) $(INCLUDE_DIRS) $(CFLAGS) gen_matypes.c -o gen_matypes

Wont this explode in a great ball of fire if somebody is doing 32
to 64bit cross compiles? While that might not be the most common
case shouldn't gen_matypes be safe for 64 to 32bit builds?

Do we still run the glslcompiler on builds as well? Doesn't it
need HOST_CC?

Cheers, Jakob.