[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] gallivm: fix comment wrt srgb accuracy.
sroland at vmware.com
sroland at vmware.com
Fri Aug 2 15:38:06 PDT 2013
From: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com>
I think it's actually not good enough now...
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_format_srgb.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_format_srgb.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_format_srgb.c
index 848d6f8..2b1fe64 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_format_srgb.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_format_srgb.c
@@ -242,8 +242,10 @@ lp_build_linear_to_srgb(struct gallivm_state *gallivm,
* error metric if you'd want to tweak them, they also MUST fit with
* the crappy polynomial above for srgb->linear since it is required
* that each srgb value maps back to the same value).
- * This function has an error of max +-0.17 (and we'd only require +-0.6),
- * for the approximated srgb->linear values the error is naturally larger
+ * This function has an error of max +-0.17. Not sure this is actually
+ * enough, we require +-0.6 but that may include the +-0.5 from integer
+ * conversion. Seems to pass all relevant tests though...
+ * For the approximated srgb->linear values the error is naturally larger
* (+-0.42) but still accurate enough (required +-0.5 essentially).
* All in all (including min/max clamp, conversion) 15 instructions.
* FMA would help (minus 2 instructions).
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list