[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Fix vertical alignment for multisampled buffers.
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Tue Nov 12 14:46:04 PST 2013
Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com> writes:
> From the Sandy Bridge PRM, Vol 1 Part 1 7.18.3.4 (Alignment Unit
> Size):
>
> j [vertical alignment] = 4 for any render target surface is
> multisampled (4x)
>
> From the Ivy Bridge PRM, Vol 4 Part 1 2.12.2.1 (SURFACE_STATE for most
> messages), under the "Surface Vertical Alignment" heading:
>
> This field is intended to be set to VALIGN_4 if the surface was
> rendered as a depth buffer, for a multisampled (4x) render target,
> or for a multisampled (8x) render target, since these surfaces
> support only alignment of 4.
>
> Back in 2012 when we added multisampling support to the i965 driver,
> we forgot to update the logic for computing the vertical alignment, so
> we were often using a vertical alignment of 2 for multisampled
> buffers, leading to subtle rendering errors.
>
> Note that the specs also require a vertical alignment of 4 for all
> Y-tiled render target surfaces; I plan to address that in a separate
> patch.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53077
Now I want to rush home and test my rb-miplevels code on snb again,
which was failing on some msaa tests.
CC stable, and:
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20131112/4fbf38e7/attachment.pgp>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list