[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965/hsw: compute DDX in a subspan based only on top row
Mark Mueller
markkmueller at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 15:27:10 PDT 2013
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mark Mueller <markkmueller at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Chia-I Wu <olv at lunarg.com>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> This scenario is where I'd place my bets, especially given that the
> numbers
> >> are based on Xonotic. I benchmarked this patch using Xonotic on Bay
> Trail as
> >> is and by replacing !brw->is_haswell with !brw->is_baytrail. With ultra
> and
> >> ultimate levels at medium and high resolutions, the results were all
> >> essentially the same at comparable resolutions and quality levels.
> > Isn't Bay Trail based on Ivy Bridge?
> For Bay Trail, this might help you
>
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-September/044288.html
>
> if you are interested.
>
Testing with Bay Trail shows no performance improvement with this patch.
Most likely there are one or more CPU bottlenecks on Bay Tail that hide a
majority of the performance gains of this change.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20130917/52472261/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list