[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] glsl: Allow explicit binding on atomics again
Chris Forbes
chrisf at ijw.co.nz
Sat Apr 12 00:44:46 PDT 2014
As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
here.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf at ijw.co.nz>
Cc: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
---
src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp b/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp
index e60bb64..2100e05 100644
--- a/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp
+++ b/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp
@@ -296,8 +296,10 @@ link_set_uniform_initializers(struct gl_shader_program *prog)
linker::set_block_binding(prog, iface_type->name,
var->data.binding);
}
+ } else if (type->contains_atomic()) {
+ /* we don't actually need to do anything. */
} else {
- assert(!"Explicit binding not on a sampler or UBO.");
+ assert(!"Explicit binding not on a sampler, UBO or atomic.");
}
} else if (var->constant_value) {
linker::set_uniform_initializer(mem_ctx, prog, var->name,
--
1.9.2
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list