[Mesa-dev] Updated debdiff for mesa to compile on m68k
t.glaser at tarent.de
Thu Jul 17 07:24:20 PDT 2014
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Yes, implicit padding is definitely bad. I didn't realize I even had
> it in there, although I'm glad my STATIC_ASSERT did its job. There are
> various references to patches, however I haven't seen any. Perhaps
> they're lost in my inbox, or they were never sent to mesa-dev, or
> something else. Could the patch author (or another interested party)
> send it as a proper patch to mesa-dev? Assuming it doesn't break x86,
> happy to check it in.
Oh fun. I’m the patch author, and it was here:
I’ve attached the part you’re probably most interested in.
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 972 bytes
More information about the mesa-dev