[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Software rendering in EGL-DRM

[Emil Velikov]

On 21/07/14 17:02, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Giovanni can you test the series that I've not butchered anything else during
>> the rebase ?
> 
> Oh hey, sorry I missed the bit that I was expected to test the patches.
> Unfortunately, something indeed got lost: the logic to choose the
> kms_swrast driver in preference to the swrast one.
> 
> In my patches, I had:
> 
> static int
> dri_screen_create_sw(struct gbm_dri_device *dri)
> {
>    int ret;
> 
>    ret = dri_screen_create_dri2(dri, "kms_swrast");
>    if (ret == 0)
>       return ret;
> 
>    return dri_screen_create_swrast(dri);
> }
> 
> That would take the place of dri_screen_create_swrast in the
> dri_device_create() call site.
> With your patches, the kms_swrast driver is effectively never loaded.
> 
Am I day-dreaming, or is this the same as your initial concern as stated here
[0] ? If so I believe that this should be fully addressed with the follow-up
revision of patches 1 [1] & 2 [2].

Perhaps the updated patches never made it to your inbox :'(

-Emil

[0] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-July/063260.html
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-July/063236.html
[2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-July/063237.html


> Giovanni
> 
>> Thanks
>> Emil
>>
>> On 11/07/14 18:19, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Here is hopefully the last iteration of Giovanni's patches, rebased
>>> on top of the buildsystem "mayhem" that I've caused recently.
>>>
>>> I've a few small changes in patch 1, most significant of which is
>>> s/LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE/GBM_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE, as I think that having an
>>> LIBGL envvar to control gbm is ambiguous and may cause some unexpected
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Giovanni can you please test that I haven't broken the series with
>>> megadrivers and/or during rebase.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Emil
>>>
>>>
>>