[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Always use Y-tiled buffers on SKL+
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Apr 13 07:31:29 PDT 2015
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:16:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Starting with Skylake, the display engine is capable of scanning out from
> Y-tiled buffers. As such, we can and should use Y-tiling for better efficiency.
>
> Note that the buffer allocation done for mipmaps will already never allocate an
> X-tiled buffer for GEN9.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
You need a recent enough ddx to make use of Y-tiled buffers, which atm
still doesn't yet exist. This would at least need some kind of handshake
with the compositor to make sure it understands this, presuming I didn't
miss something.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 4 ++++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> index eb226d5..4408ac9 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(struct brw_context *brw,
> *height = 4;
> break;
> case I915_TILING_X:
> + /* The docs are somewhat confusing with the way the tables are displayed.
> + * However, it does clearly state: "MCS and Lossless compression is
> + * supported for TiledY/TileYs/TileYf non-MSRTs only." */
> + assert(brw->gen < 9);
> *width_px = 64 / mt->cpp;
> *height = 2;
> }
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
> index cb9710f..06f0a06 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,11 @@ intel_create_image(__DRIscreen *screen,
> int cpp;
> unsigned long pitch;
>
> - tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> + if (intelScreen->devinfo->gen >= 9) {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_Y;
> + } else {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> + }
> if (use & __DRI_IMAGE_USE_CURSOR) {
> if (width != 64 || height != 64)
> return NULL;
> @@ -1101,8 +1105,14 @@ intel_detect_swizzling(struct intel_screen *screen)
> drm_intel_bo *buffer;
> unsigned long flags = 0;
> unsigned long aligned_pitch;
> - uint32_t tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> uint32_t swizzle_mode = 0;
> + uint32_t tiling;
> +
> + if (screen->devinfo->gen >= 9) {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_Y;
> + } else {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> + }
Unneeded change (swizzling doesn't change between X and Y tiled) and gen9+
is hardcoded to unswizzled in the hw anyway.
-Daniel
>
> buffer = drm_intel_bo_alloc_tiled(screen->bufmgr, "swizzle test",
> 64, 64, 4,
> @@ -1409,7 +1419,12 @@ intelAllocateBuffer(__DRIscreen *screen,
> return NULL;
>
> /* The front and back buffers are color buffers, which are X tiled. */
> - uint32_t tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> + uint32_t tiling;
> + if (intelScreen->devinfo->gen >= 9) {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_Y;
> + } else {
> + tiling = I915_TILING_X;
> + }
> unsigned long pitch;
> int cpp = format / 8;
> intelBuffer->bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc_tiled(intelScreen->bufmgr,
> --
> 2.3.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list