[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] radeonsi: Cache LLVMTargetMachine object in si_screen

Michel Dänzer michel at daenzer.net
Tue Jan 6 17:10:17 PST 2015


On 07.01.2015 06:33, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:48:31PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 24.12.2014 02:49, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> Rather than building a new one every compile.  This should reduce some
>>> of the overhead of compiling shaders.
>>
>> Thanks, though unfortunately it doesn't seem to make much difference for
>> piglit for me.
>>
>>
>>> One consequence of this change is that we lose the MachineInstrs dumps
>>> when dumping the shaders via R600_DEBUG.  The LLVM IR and assembly is
>>> still dumped, and if you still want to see the MachineInstr dump, you
>>> can run the dumped LLVM IR through llc.
>>
>> Sounds reasonable, but...
>>
>>
>>> @@ -503,5 +510,12 @@ struct pipe_screen *radeonsi_screen_create(struct radeon_winsys *ws)
>>>  	/* Create the auxiliary context. This must be done last. */
>>>  	sscreen->b.aux_context = sscreen->b.b.context_create(&sscreen->b.b, NULL);
>>>  
>>> +	/* Initialize LLVM TargetMachine */
>>> +	r600_target = radeon_llvm_get_r600_target();
>>> +	sscreen->tm = LLVMCreateTargetMachine(r600_target, "r600--",
>>> +				r600_get_llvm_processor_name(sscreen->b.family),
>>> +				"+DumpCode", LLVMCodeGenLevelDefault, LLVMRelocDefault,
>>> +				LLVMCodeModelDefault);
>>> +
>>>  	return &sscreen->b.b;
>>>  }
>>
>> ... since you pass "+DumpCode" here, the MachineInstrs are actually
>> always dumped unconditionally. With that fixed, this patch is
>>
> 
> I've removed the MF.dump() call in the LLVM tree, so this won't happen.

That won't help people using LLVM 3.4 (or 3.5?), will it?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list