[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] glsl: use the fast hash table for ir_validate

Timothy Arceri t_arceri at yahoo.com.au
Thu Jul 9 23:42:23 PDT 2015


On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 17:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au> writes:
> 
> > ---
> > 
> >  Some of the AoA tests currently get stuck in an optimisation
> >  loop for a long time and this was taking a large amount of time.
> >  Its a symptom not a cause but I don't see any issue with using the faster
> >  version.
> > 
> >  src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp | 17 ++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp b/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp
> > index cfe0df3..f3752bd 100644
> > --- a/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp
> > +++ b/src/glsl/ir_validate.cpp
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "ir.h"
> >  #include "ir_hierarchical_visitor.h"
> > -#include "program/hash_table.h"
> > +#include "util/hash_table.h"
> >  #include "glsl_types.h"
> >  
> >  namespace {
> > @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ class ir_validate : public ir_hierarchical_visitor {
> >  public:
> >     ir_validate()
> >     {
> > -      this->ht = hash_table_ctor(0, hash_table_pointer_hash,
> > -                            hash_table_pointer_compare);
> > +      this->ht = _mesa_hash_table_create(NULL, _mesa_hash_pointer,
> > +                                         _mesa_key_pointer_equal);
> >  
> >        this->current_function = NULL;
> >  
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ public:
> >  
> >     ~ir_validate()
> >     {
> > -      hash_table_dtor(this->ht);
> > +      _mesa_hash_table_destroy(this->ht, NULL);
> >     }
> >  
> >     virtual ir_visitor_status visit(ir_variable *v);
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ ir_validate::visit(ir_dereference_variable *ir)
> >        abort();
> >     }
> >  
> > -   if (hash_table_find(ht, ir->var) == NULL) {
> > +   if (_mesa_hash_table_search(ht, ir->var) == NULL) {
> >        printf("ir_dereference_variable @ %p specifies undeclared variable 
> > "
> >          "`%s' @ %p\n",
> >          (void *) ir, ir->var->name, (void *) ir->var);
> > @@ -730,8 +730,7 @@ ir_validate::visit(ir_variable *ir)
> >     if (ir->name && ir->is_name_ralloced())
> >        assert(ralloc_parent(ir->name) == ir);
> >  
> > -   hash_table_insert(ht, ir, ir);
> > -
> > +   _mesa_hash_table_insert(ht, ir, ir);
> >  
> >     /* If a variable is an array, verify that the maximum array index is 
> > in
> >      * bounds.  There was once an error in AST-to-HIR conversion that set 
> > this
> > @@ -887,13 +886,13 @@ ir_validate::validate_ir(ir_instruction *ir, void 
> > *data)
> >  {
> >     struct hash_table *ht = (struct hash_table *) data;
> >  
> > -   if (hash_table_find(ht, ir)) {
> > +   if (_mesa_hash_table_search(ht, ir)) {
> >        printf("Instruction node present twice in ir tree:\n");
> >        ir->print();
> >        printf("\n");
> >        abort();
> >     }
> > -   hash_table_insert(ht, ir, ir);
> > +   _mesa_hash_table_insert(ht, ir, ir);
> >  }
> 
> It looks like you should use a set instead of a hash table, since you
> don't need a separate data field.

Right thanks, I've sent a new patch.


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list