[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] glsl: avoid compiler's segfault when processing operators with void arguments
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
siglesias at igalia.com
Wed Jul 15 23:25:10 PDT 2015
On 13/07/15 13:06, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On 11/07/15 19:38, Renaud Gaubert wrote:
>> This is done by returning an rvalue of type void in the
>> ast_function_expression::hir function instead of a void expression.
>>
>> This produces (in the case of the ternary) an hir with a call
>> to the void returning function and an assignment of a void variable
>> which will be optimized out (the assignment) during the optimization
>> pass.
>>
>> This fix results in having a valid subexpression in the many
>> different cases where the subexpressions are functions whose
>> return values are void.
>>
>> Thus preventing to dereference NULL in the following cases:
>> * binary operator
>> * unary operators
>> * ternary operator
>> * comparison operators (except equal and nequal operator)
>>
>> Equal and nequal had to be handled as a special case because
>> instead of segfaulting on a forbidden syntax it was now accepting
>> expressions with a void return value on either (or both) side of
>> the expression.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Renaud Gaubert <renaud at lse.epita.fr>
>> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Laskar <gabriel at lse.epita.fr>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85252
>>
>> ---
>> Piglit tests were sent to the Piglit mailing list:
>> * glsl-1.10 Adds tests on how void functions are handled
>>
>> src/glsl/ast_function.cpp | 9 ++++++++-
>> src/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp | 9 ++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp b/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
>> index 92e26bf..ac32723 100644
>> --- a/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
>> +++ b/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
>> @@ -1785,7 +1785,14 @@ ast_function_expression::hir(exec_list *instructions,
>> /* an error has already been emitted */
>> value = ir_rvalue::error_value(ctx);
>> } else {
>> - value = generate_call(instructions, sig, &actual_parameters, state);
>> + value = generate_call(instructions, sig, &actual_parameters, state);
>> + if (!value) {
>> + ir_variable *const tmp = new(ctx) ir_variable(glsl_type::void_type,
>> + "void_var",
>> + ir_var_temporary);
>> + instructions->push_tail(tmp);
>> + value = new(ctx) ir_dereference_variable(tmp);
>> + }
>
> Indention. You used two spaces indention instead of three.
>
> With that fixed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias at igalia.com>
>
> If you don't have commit rights, I can fix the indention, add the R-b
> and push the patch to master (no need of v3 patch). Just tell me to do
> so (*).
>
Pushed! :)
Sam
> Thanks for your contribution!
>
> Sam
>
> (*) Also for your piglit patch. If nobody has pushed your piglit patch
> yet, I can do it.
>
>> }
>>
>> return value;
>> diff --git a/src/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp b/src/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
>> index 8cb46be..0d0ad2a 100644
>> --- a/src/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
>> +++ b/src/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
>> @@ -1270,7 +1270,14 @@ ast_expression::do_hir(exec_list *instructions,
>> * applied to one operand that can make them match, in which
>> * case this conversion is done."
>> */
>> - if ((!apply_implicit_conversion(op[0]->type, op[1], state)
>> +
>> + if (op[0]->type == glsl_type::void_type || op[1]->type == glsl_type::void_type) {
>> + _mesa_glsl_error(& loc, state, "`%s': wrong operand types: "
>> + "no operation `%1$s' exists that takes a left-hand "
>> + "operand of type 'void' or a right operand of type "
>> + "'void'", (this->oper == ast_equal) ? "==" : "!=");
>> + error_emitted = true;
>> + } else if ((!apply_implicit_conversion(op[0]->type, op[1], state)
>> && !apply_implicit_conversion(op[1]->type, op[0], state))
>> || (op[0]->type != op[1]->type)) {
>> _mesa_glsl_error(& loc, state, "operands of `%s' must have the same "
>>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list