[Mesa-dev] [v3 PATCH 03/10] mesa: Complete implementation for ARB_framebuffer_no_attachments in Mesa core

[Rogovin, Kevin]

> Extra space between . and "
Fix I will

> Extra space before . 
Fix I will

> Also, if anyone is ever grepping for MAX_FRAMEBUFFER_SAMPLES, they won't find this. I'd move the whole word to the next line.
Ok.

> +       *
> +       * The same requirements are also in place for GL 4.5,
> +       * Section 9.4.1 "Framebuffer Attachment Completeness", pg 310-311
> +       *
> +       * However, this is a tighter restriction than previous version of GL.
> +       * In interest of better compatibility, we will not enforce these
> +       * restrictions.
> +       */

> Comment at the end of a block like this looks strange. I'm not sure what it's commenting on.

The purpose of the comment block is to list what the extension and GL4.5 add to the requirements for FBO happiness.  The last sentence is writing out *now* that these added requirements, if enforced, risk breaking older applications and stating that the extra requirements will not be enforced. Would it be helpful at the top of the comment block to say "GL4.5/GL_ARB_framebuffer_no_attachments" added these requirements?