[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 00/24] i965: Refactor register classes
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 08:12:39 PST 2015
Hi Matt,
On 3 November 2015 at 00:29, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> backend_reg (from which fs_reg, src_reg, and dst_reg inherit) includes a
> brw_reg that's used for "hardware regs" -- precolored registers or architecture
> registers. This leads to properties like source modifiers, the register type,
> swizzles, and writemasks being duplicated between the derived classes and the
> brw_reg and of course often being out of sync.
>
Great work ! While looking around the *_reg::init() I noticed a few
places where we don't derive (clone all the member variables) new
*_reg correctly. Plus I believe I've seen a few initialised member
variables - mostly on the abs/negate front.
I'm curious of there could attribute to the intermittent piglit
failures that people occasionally see.
> This series removes the "fixed_hw_reg" field from backend_reg by just making
> backend_reg inherit from brw_reg, and then removes fields duplicated in the
> derived classes. In the process, it gets rid of HW_REG.
>
I remember initially looking at fixed_hw_reg and having a few 'wtf'
moments. Inheriting from brw_reg will certainly help other (fs/vec4
IR) new-comers.
> This in turn simplifies a lot of code -- no longer do you have to check a
> number of subfields if file == HW_REG.
>
> The last few patches begin some clean ups -- since the base of our register
> classes is now brw_reg we don't need to do as many conversions. I've only
> handled immediates so far and more is planned, but the series is growing large
> and is a lot of churn already.
>
> The sizes of the register classes all shrink by 8 bytes:
>
> backend_reg 20 -> 12
> fs_reg 40 -> 32
> src_reg 32 -> 24?
> dst_reg 32 -> 24?
>
> The remaining fields in the classes are
>
> backend_reg: reg_offset
> fs_reg: reladdr, subreg_offset, stride
> src_reg reladdr
> dst_reg reladdr
>
I'm thinking that we can also move reladdr to backend_reg. Although
that'll be obviously follow up patches.
Fwiw I really like the whole series and barring a few small comments I
would love to see it land.
Big thanks for doing this.
-Emil
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list