[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 00/10] i965: always mark used surfaces in the visitors
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Fri Oct 30 07:19:48 PDT 2015
Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral at igalia.com> writes:
> Right now some opcodes that only use constant surface indexing mark them as
> used in the generator while others do it in the visitor. When the opcode can
> handle both direct and indirect surface indexing then some opcodes handle
> only the constant part in the generator and leave the indirect case to the
> caller. It is all very inconsistent and leads to confusion, since one has to
> go and look into the generator code in each case to check if it marks surfaces
> as used or not, and in which cases.
>
> when I was working on SSBOs I was tempted to try and fix this but then I
> forgot. Jordan bumped into this recently too when comparing visitor
> code paths for similar opcodes (ubos and ssbos) that need to handle this
> differently because they use different generator opcodes.
>
> Since the generator opcodes never handle marking of indirect surfaces, just
> leave surface marking to the caller completely, since callers always have
> all the information needed for this. It also makes things more consistent
> and clear for everyone: marking surfaces as used is always on the side
> of the visitor, never the generator.
>
> No piglit regressions observed in my IVB laptop. Would be nice to have
> someone giving this a try with Jenkins though, to make sure I did not miss
> anything in paths specific to other gens.
Jenkins seems to be mostly happy about the series except for three
apparent regressions:
piglit.spec.arb_fragment_layer_viewport.layer-gs-writes-in-range.bdwm64
piglit.spec.arb_shader_texture_lod.compiler.tex_grad-texture2dproj-2d-vec4.frag.g965m64
piglit.spec.glsl-es-1_00.compiler.structure-and-array-operations.sampler-array-index.frag.g965m64
The latter two die with a crash so you may be able to look into them
even if you don't have the original i965 by using INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE. ;)
>
> Iago Toral Quiroga (10):
> i965/fs: Do not mark direct used surfaces in
> VARYING_PULL_CONSTANT_LOAD
> i965/fs: Do not mark used direct surfaces in
> UNIFORM_PULL_CONSTANT_LOAD
> i965/fs: Do not mark used direct surfaces in the generator for texture
> opcodes
> i965/vec4: Do not mark used direct surfaces in
> VS_OPCODE_PULL_CONSTANT_LOAD
> i965/vec4: Do not mark used direct surfaces in the generator for
> texture opcodes
> i965/vec4: Do not mark used surfaces in SHADER_OPCODE_SHADER_TIME_ADD
> i965/fs: Do not mark used surfaces in SHADER_OPCODE_SHADER_TIME_ADD
> i965/vec4: Do not mark used surfaces in VS_OPCODE_GET_BUFFER_SIZE
> i965/fs: Do not mark used surfaces in FS_OPCODE_GET_BUFFER_SIZE
> i965/fs: Do not mark used surfaces in
> FS_OPCODE_FB_WRITE/FS_OPCODE_REP_FB_WRITE
>
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp | 12 ++++++-
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h | 3 +-
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp | 31 -----------------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 35 +++++++++++++------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp | 24 ++++++++-----
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4.cpp | 3 ++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_generator.cpp | 19 ----------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_nir.cpp | 44 +++++++++++++++---------
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_visitor.cpp | 7 ++--
> 9 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20151030/63e5b6f6/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list