[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 09/28] XXX:configure: set HAVE_PLATFORM_foo as applicable

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 13:42:35 UTC 2016


On 13 December 2016 at 11:14, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 2016-12-08 19:21:49 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>> ---
>> Should we keep this here and feed the defines to all sources or apply
>> them locally ?
>>
>> If we go with this approach, need to drop the other existing defines.
>
> What "other existing defines"? I can't find anything that would use
> these either.
>
I am split whether we want the defines propagated globally, or locally
as we do with HAVE_*_PLATFORM in EGL's src/egl/Makefile.am.
On the Vulkan side we have to use the VK ones, because of $reasons,
thus the hesitation.

> Maybe related: I haven't received anything past patch 11/28, and it
> seems neither has mailman's archive [1].
> Is this something you use later in your series?
>
10 and 11 [0] are trivial cleanups in st/va that I've noticed while I
was going through. Perhaps I should have kept them separate... I don't
feel too strong either way.

> The patches so far look good to me; everything up to #8 is:
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com>
> (with the change in #6 that you suggested)
>
> On a related note, this series will break something I'm working on, but
> isn't anywhere near ready yet anyway (-ENOTIMEā€¦) ^^
>
Pardon for that :-\ Let me know if things are too messy/etc. as you
find the time to finish your work.

Thanks for having a look !
Emil
[0] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/126454/


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list