[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/6] i965/gen6-7: Implement stall and flushes required prior to switching pipelines.
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Sun Jan 3 15:41:08 PST 2016
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> writes:
> On Saturday, January 2, 2016 10:48:02 PM PST Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Switching the current pipeline while it's not completely idle or the
>> read and write caches aren't flushed can lead to corruption. Fixes
>> misrendering of at least the following Khronos CTS test:
>>
>> ES31-CTS.shader_image_load_store.basic-allTargets-store-fs
>>
>> The stall and flushes are no longer required on Gen8+.
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93323
>> ---
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c b/src/mesa/drivers/
> dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c
>> index 7d53d18..75540c1 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c
>> @@ -886,6 +886,34 @@ brw_emit_select_pipeline(struct brw_context *brw, enum
> brw_pipeline pipeline)
>>
>> brw->ctx.NewDriverState |= BRW_NEW_CC_STATE;
>> }
>> +
>> + } else if (brw->gen >= 6) {
>> + /* From "BXML » GT » MI » vol1a GPU Overview » [Instruction]
>> + * PIPELINE_SELECT [DevBWR+]":
>
> Can we cite the public docs?
>
The public docs for PIPELINE_SELECT seemed rather inaccurate. The IVB
version I have in front of me right now is missing this one workaround,
and the BDW version mentions it incorrectly. Sigh...
>> + *
>> + * Project: DEVSNB+
>> + *
>> + * Software must ensure all the write caches are flushed through a
>> + * stalling PIPE_CONTROL command followed by another PIPE_CONTROL
>> + * command to invalidate read only caches prior to programming
>> + * MI_PIPELINE_SELECT command to change the Pipeline Select Mode.
>> + */
>> + const unsigned dc_flush =
>> + brw->gen >= 7 ? PIPE_CONTROL_DATA_CACHE_INVALIDATE : 0;
>
> I was going to suggest doing a brw_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush first
> on Sandybridge, but I forgot that we now just emit that at the start
> of every state upload. Fairly moot anyway since we don't do GPGPU on
> Sandybridge anyway.
>
Hmm, that sounds very sensible to me, it would be rather fragile for
this function to rely on a flush with post-sync op having been done
previously, even if at this point this will only be called once at
context creation on SNB -- Although for the same reason it seems rather
fragile for brw_emit_pipe_control_flush() to assume that the workaround
has been applied already. I'd be inclined to change
brw_emit_pipe_control_flush() to emit the post-sync op when needed on
SNB just like we do for other PIPE_CONTROL workarounds on Gen7 and Gen8.
>> +
>> + brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_FLUSH |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH |
>> + dc_flush |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_NO_WRITE |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL);
>
> Why RENDER_TARGET_FLUSH, DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH, DATA_CACHE_INVALIDATE,
> and NO_WRITE? The cited workaround explains a CS Stall and the RO
> invalidations below, but I'm not seeing why the others are needed.
>
It also says that "software must ensure all the write caches are
flushed".
>> +
>> + brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_INSTRUCTION_INVALIDATE |
>> + PIPE_CONTROL_NO_WRITE);
>> }
>>
>> /* Select the pipeline */
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160103/5d6cd303/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list