[Mesa-dev] radeonfb: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0x98000000-0x9fffffff pref]

Mathieu Malaterre malat at debian.org
Tue Jun 7 06:05:57 UTC 2016


Hi Alex,

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [+ dri-devel]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <malat at debian.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Before reporting a possible invalid bug report. Does anyone knows why
>>> radeaonfb is not configured the same way radeon is ? For instance on a
>>> PowerPC machine, when Open Firmware Frame Buffer is used (OFfb), I
>>> cannot `modprobe radeonfb` (but I can load `radeon`). It fails with:
>>>
>>> [   96.551486] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007)
>>> [   96.551526] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem
>>> 0x98000000-0x9fffffff pref]
>>> [   96.551531] radeonfb (0000:00:10.0): cannot request region 0.
>>> [   96.551545] radeonfb: probe of 0000:00:10.0 failed with error -16
>>>
>>> It seems (to me) that it should be possible to add something like this
>>> to `radeonfb`:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c#L353
>>>
>>> Is the above correct ?
>
> Yes, probably.  But is there any reason why you'd want to use radeonfb
> rather than radeon?

I'll check with the debian-installer team if this is possible. Right
now the debian-installer is setup to use `radeonfb` (at least on
PowerPC) during the text-based installation.

ref: https://bugs.debian.org/825840#77

-M


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list