[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/6] radeonsi: fix various CLEAR_STATE issues
Marek Olšák
maraeo at gmail.com
Tue Aug 1 11:23:31 UTC 2017
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/2017 12:43 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> From: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak at amd.com>
>>
>> ---
>> src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>> index 7dadc4a..c151a98 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>> @@ -4542,24 +4542,46 @@ static void si_init_config(struct si_context
>> *sctx)
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028350_PA_SC_RASTER_CONFIG,
>> raster_config);
>> if (sctx->b.chip_class >= CIK)
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_028354_PA_SC_RASTER_CONFIG_1,
>> raster_config_1);
>> } else {
>> si_write_harvested_raster_configs(sctx, pm4,
>> raster_config, raster_config_1);
>> }
>> }
>> + /* CLEAR_STATE doesn't clear these correctly on certain
>> generations.
>> + * I don't know why. Deduced by trial and error.
>> + */
>> + if (sctx->b.chip_class <= CIK) {
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_028B28_VGT_STRMOUT_DRAW_OPAQUE_OFFSET, 0);
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028204_PA_SC_WINDOW_SCISSOR_TL,
>> S_028204_WINDOW_OFFSET_DISABLE(1));
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028240_PA_SC_GENERIC_SCISSOR_TL,
>> S_028240_WINDOW_OFFSET_DISABLE(1));
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028244_PA_SC_GENERIC_SCISSOR_BR,
>> + S_028244_BR_X(16384) |
>> S_028244_BR_Y(16384));
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028030_PA_SC_SCREEN_SCISSOR_TL, 0);
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028034_PA_SC_SCREEN_SCISSOR_BR,
>> + S_028034_BR_X(16384) |
>> S_028034_BR_Y(16384));
>> + }
>> +
>
>
> After grepping the clearstate_*.h files, they seem to be correctly
> initialized, did I miss something?
The workaround above is undocumented hardware territory. The one below
is documented.
>
>
>> if (sctx->b.chip_class >= GFX9) {
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_030920_VGT_MAX_VTX_INDX, ~0);
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_030924_VGT_MIN_VTX_INDX, 0);
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_030928_VGT_INDX_OFFSET, 0);
>> + } else {
>> + /* These registers, when written, also overwrite the
>> CLEAR_STATE
>> + * context, so we can't rely on CLEAR_STATE setting them.
>> + * It would be an issue if there was another UMD changing
>> them.
>> + */
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028400_VGT_MAX_VTX_INDX, ~0);
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028404_VGT_MIN_VTX_INDX, 0);
>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028408_VGT_INDX_OFFSET, 0);
>> }
>> if (sctx->b.chip_class >= CIK) {
>> if (sctx->b.chip_class >= GFX9) {
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_00B41C_SPI_SHADER_PGM_RSRC3_HS, S_00B41C_CU_EN(0xffff));
>> } else {
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_00B51C_SPI_SHADER_PGM_RSRC3_LS, S_00B51C_CU_EN(0xffff));
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_00B41C_SPI_SHADER_PGM_RSRC3_HS, 0);
>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4,
>> R_00B31C_SPI_SHADER_PGM_RSRC3_ES, S_00B31C_CU_EN(0xffff));
>>
Marek
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list