[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] st/omx_tizonia: Add --enable-omx-tizonia flag and build files
Gurkirpal Singh
gurkirpal204 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 15 05:51:54 UTC 2017
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/2017 12:25 PM, Gurkirpal Singh wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/14/2017 11:19 AM, Gurkirpal Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/14/2017 05:46 AM, Julien Isorce wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Leo,
>>>
>>> >It would be better if you can extract the common code between bellagio
>>> and tizonia to avoid the duplication.
>>>
>>> This is something Gurkirpal and me discussed, like having
>>> state_trackers/omx/common, state_trackers/omx/bellagio,
>>> state_trackers/omx/tizonia. To anticipate that Gurkirpal sent an email
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedeskto
>>> p.org/msg153562.html during the Community Bonding period in May (a few
>>> weeks from the date (early May) students are officially accepted to the
>>> date (end May) where student actually starts working)
>>>
>>> The problem with the directory layout above is that it would look like
>>> it will be built together in the same shared library. This is not good
>>> because it is suppose to export OMX_ComponentInit for each target. Of
>>> course this would still be possible to have 2 shared libs but I believe in
>>> state_trackers dir, all sub dir are for one target. Also we were afraid
>>> that there would be other limitations so we decided to go for a separate
>>> directory.
>>> And since there were no objections in Gurkirpal's mail above we went
>>> this way.
>>>
>>> Now if I look into state_trackers/omx_tizonia, in fact the common code
>>> with state_trackers/omx_bellagio does not have anything to do with omx. For
>>> example "slice_header". Maybe it can be moved to gallium/auxiliary/vl/ like
>>> it is done already for vl_rbsp_init. Same for omx_get_screen.
>>>
>>> So I suggest this 'factorization' to be not a blocker for merging
>>> state_trackers/omx_tizonia into usptream. But later on we can move
>>> gradually bits from state_trackers/omx_bellagio to gallium/auxiliary. And
>>> then make state_trackers/omx_tizonia use it as well.
>>> This way you will only bother about maintaining
>>> state_trackers/omx_bellagio the time being. This also allows to not slowly
>>> get its work lost.
>>>
>>> Of course we would have done differently if we knew advance. But as
>>> today Gurkirpal won't have enough time to do this factorization/move as the
>>> project ends in 1 week. Having all of this merged in upstream is not
>>> mandatory to succeed the project but Gurkirpal will need some rest after
>>> these 3 months of hard work. And who knows what happens after, whether he
>>> will still be around after sometimes or not. And this is entirely up to him.
>>>
>>> So again I suggest this factorization/move not to be a blocker for the
>>> reasons above. What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> When the whole project will be completed, as least same status as
>>> bellagio? Is there anyone keep working on this project after this step 1?
>>>
>> Hi, I plan on continuing working on this after the GSoC project ends.
>>
>>
>> Is the GSoC project done with your current patches?
>>
>> Apart from these patches, at least two more will be needed for the
> project. One for adding H.264 enc and other for adding EGLImage support to
> H.264 dec.
> Since I keep revising the commits quite frequently I'll give the link to
> the branch https://github.com/gpalsingh/mesa/commits/gsoc
>
> Good to see them, then why did you send them to review as well? not
> working well or other reason?
>
Indeed they still got a little bit of work. For instance the enc fails at
EOS https://github.com/gpalsingh/mesa/issues/4 and using EGLImage shows
wrong colours https://github.com/gpalsingh/mesa/issues/6
Also Julien suggested that we make it step by step i.e. Fix decoder and
then get it reviewed and then same steps for enc and EGLImage.
> And why don't you include mpeg2 and hevc to your project, and then after
> performance test, it could be replacing bellagio completely.
>
The major aim of this project was to add EGLImage support. Except the two
components adding other components was optional from the start. Also hasn't
been as straightforward as expected. Significant amount of time was spent
on making gst-omx OMX IL 1.2 conformant. Tizonia needed some work since it
was intended for mostly audio related uses. Each new component will need a
bit of work in these libs too.
Cheers
>
> Regards,
> Leo
>
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Leo
>>
>>
>>
>>> The left stuff compared to bellagio are codecs of mpeg2 and hevc, and
>>> encoding that is more important, since the most usage for omx currently is
>>> to use transcoding from one codec to another.
>>>
>>> Other is the transcoding performance, at least meet the performance of
>>> bellagio's.
>>>
>>> If the above could be addressed at early time, we could remove Bellagio
>>> completely, then there is no need to do any refactor now.
>>>
>> The original plan was this but making gst-omx OMX IL 1.2 compatible has
>> been a bit time consuming.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW what's the plan for new feature like EGL Images?
>>>
>> We've been able to make it work but with wrong colours in output. I've
>> written more about it and the performance comparison in my blog post here
>> https://singhcodes.wordpress.com/2017/08/04/gsoc-2017-third-phase-starts/
>> But recently the EGLImage hook stopped working and I've opened the issue
>> https://github.com/gpalsingh/mesa/issues/15 to keep track of it.
>> This happened after we fixed another issue which made changes to gst-omx
>> which might be the cause https://github.com/gpals
>> ingh/mesa/issues/2#issuecomment-321839195
>> I'm still looking into this.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Leo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> On 13 August 2017 at 16:52, Gurkirpal Singh <gurkirpal204 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the patch 1?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the patches got messed up somehow while sending, I could only
>>>> see two patches on mail-archive but three on patchwork.
>>>> Tried two times and same result.
>>>> About the first one I got a mail saying that it was too large has been
>>>> put aside for mod approval.
>>>> The changes I made were to just rename the st/omx directory to
>>>> st/omx_bellagio (the reason it became large)
>>>> and renaming bits in the configure.ac and Makefiles.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/12/2017 12:07 PM, Gurkirpal Singh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Coexist with --enable-omx so they can be built independently
>>>>>> Detect tizonia package config file
>>>>>> Generate libomxtiz_mesa.so and install it to libtizcore.pc::pluginsdir
>>>>>> Only compile empty source (target.c) for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2: Show error message when --enable-omx is used (Christian)
>>>>>> Use single PKG_CHECK_MODULES for omx_tizonia checks (Emil)
>>>>>> Use spaces instead of tabs
>>>>>> Add checks around omx-tizonia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GSoC Project link: https://summerofcode.withgoogl
>>>>>> e.com/projects/#4737166321123328
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gurkirpal Singh <gurkirpal204 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Julien Isorce <julien.iso... at gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> configure.ac | 40 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>>> src/gallium/Makefile.am | 4 ++
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile.am | 77
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/omx.sym | 11 +++++
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/target.c | 2 +
>>>>>> 5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile.am
>>>>>> create mode 100644 src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/omx.sym
>>>>>> create mode 100644 src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/target.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>>>>>> index 38af96a..5669695 100644
>>>>>> --- a/configure.ac
>>>>>> +++ b/configure.ac
>>>>>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ dnl Versions for external dependencies
>>>>>> DRI2PROTO_REQUIRED=2.8
>>>>>> GLPROTO_REQUIRED=1.4.14
>>>>>> LIBOMXIL_BELLAGIO_REQUIRED=0.0
>>>>>> +LIBOMXIL_TIZONIA_REQUIRED=0.9.0
>>>>>> LIBVA_REQUIRED=0.38.0
>>>>>> VDPAU_REQUIRED=1.1
>>>>>> WAYLAND_REQUIRED=1.11
>>>>>> @@ -1216,14 +1217,19 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([vdpau],
>>>>>> [enable_vdpau=auto])
>>>>>> AC_ARG_ENABLE([omx],
>>>>>> [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-omx],
>>>>>> - [DEPRECATED: Use --enable-omx-bellagio instead
>>>>>> @<:@default=auto@:>@])],
>>>>>> - [AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-omx is deprecated. Use
>>>>>> --enable-omx-bellagio instead.])],
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this in patch 1?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is so.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + [DEPRECATED: Use --enable-omx-bellagio or
>>>>>> --enable-omx-tizonia instead @<:@default=auto@:>@])],
>>>>>> + [AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-omx is deprecated. Use
>>>>>> --enable-omx-bellagio or --enable-omx-tizonia instead.])],
>>>>>> [])
>>>>>> AC_ARG_ENABLE([omx-bellagio],
>>>>>> [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-omx-bellagio],
>>>>>> [enable OpenMAX Bellagio library @<:@default=disabled@
>>>>>> :>@])],
>>>>>> [enable_omx_bellagio="$enableval"],
>>>>>> [enable_omx_bellagio=no])
>>>>>> +AC_ARG_ENABLE([omx-tizonia],
>>>>>> + [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-omx-tizonia],
>>>>>> + [enable OpenMAX Tizonia library @<:@default=disabled@
>>>>>> :>@])],
>>>>>> + [enable_omx_tizonia="$enableval"],
>>>>>> + [enable_omx_tizonia=no])
>>>>>> AC_ARG_ENABLE([va],
>>>>>> [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-va],
>>>>>> [enable va library @<:@default=auto@:>@])],
>>>>>> @@ -1275,6 +1281,7 @@ if test "x$enable_opengl" = xno -a \
>>>>>> "x$enable_xvmc" = xno -a \
>>>>>> "x$enable_vdpau" = xno -a \
>>>>>> "x$enable_omx_bellagio" = xno -a \
>>>>>> + "x$enable_omx_tizonia" = xno -a \
>>>>>> "x$enable_va" = xno -a \
>>>>>> "x$enable_opencl" = xno; then
>>>>>> AC_MSG_ERROR([at least one API should be enabled])
>>>>>> @@ -2121,6 +2128,10 @@ if test -n "$with_gallium_drivers" -a
>>>>>> "x$with_gallium_drivers" != xswrast; then
>>>>>> PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([libomxil-bellagio >=
>>>>>> $LIBOMXIL_BELLAGIO_REQUIRED], [enable_omx_bellagio=yes],
>>>>>> [enable_omx_bellagio=no])
>>>>>> fi
>>>>>> + if test "x$enable_omx_tizonia" = xauto -a
>>>>>> "x$have_omx_platform" = xyes; then
>>>>>> + PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([libtizonia >= $LIBOMXIL_TIZONIA_REQUIRED],
>>>>>> [enable_omx_tizonia=yes], [enable_omx_tizonia=no])
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> if test "x$enable_va" = xauto -a "x$have_va_platform" = xyes;
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([libva >= $LIBVA_REQUIRED],
>>>>>> [enable_va=yes], [enable_va=no])
>>>>>> fi
>>>>>> @@ -2130,6 +2141,7 @@ if test "x$enable_dri" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_xvmc" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_vdpau" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_omx_bellagio" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> + "x$enable_omx_tizonia" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_va" = xyes; then
>>>>>> need_gallium_vl=yes
>>>>>> fi
>>>>>> @@ -2138,6 +2150,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(NEED_GALLIUM_VL, test
>>>>>> "x$need_gallium_vl" = xyes)
>>>>>> if test "x$enable_xvmc" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_vdpau" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_omx_bellagio" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> + "x$enable_omx_tizonia" = xyes -o \
>>>>>> "x$enable_va" = xyes; then
>>>>>> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([VL], [x11-xcb xcb xcb-dri2 >=
>>>>>> $XCBDRI2_REQUIRED])
>>>>>> need_gallium_vl_winsys=yes
>>>>>> @@ -2172,6 +2185,18 @@ if test "x$enable_omx_bellagio" = xyes; then
>>>>>> fi
>>>>>> AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_ST_OMX_BELLAGIO, test "x$enable_omx_bellagio"
>>>>>> = xyes)
>>>>>> +if test "x$enable_omx_tizonia" = xyes; then
>>>>>> + if test "x$have_omx_platform" != xyes; then
>>>>>> + AC_MSG_ERROR([OMX requires at least one of the x11 or drm
>>>>>> platforms])
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>>> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([OMX_TIZONIA],
>>>>>> + [libtizonia >= $LIBOMXIL_TIZONIA_REQUIRED
>>>>>> + tizilheaders >= $LIBOMXIL_TIZONIA_REQUIRED
>>>>>> + libtizplatform >= $LIBOMXIL_TIZONIA_REQUIRED])
>>>>>> + gallium_st="$gallium_st omx_tizonia"
>>>>>> +fi
>>>>>> +AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_ST_OMX_TIZONIA, test "x$enable_omx_tizonia" =
>>>>>> xyes)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> if test "x$enable_va" = xyes; then
>>>>>> if test "x$have_va_platform" != xyes; then
>>>>>> AC_MSG_ERROR([VA requires at least one of the x11 drm or
>>>>>> wayland platforms])
>>>>>> @@ -2342,6 +2367,15 @@ AC_ARG_WITH([omx-bellagio-libdir],
>>>>>> $PKG_CONFIG
>>>>>> --define-variable=libdir=\$libdir --variable=pluginsdir
>>>>>> libomxil-bellagio`])
>>>>>> AC_SUBST([OMX_BELLAGIO_LIB_INSTALL_DIR])
>>>>>> +dnl Directory for OMX_TIZONIA libs
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +AC_ARG_WITH([omx-tizonia-libdir],
>>>>>> + [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-omx-tizonia-libdir=DIR],
>>>>>> + [directory for the OMX_TIZONIA libraries])],
>>>>>> + [OMX_TIZONIA_LIB_INSTALL_DIR="$withval"],
>>>>>> + [OMX_TIZONIA_LIB_INSTALL_DIR=`$PKG_CONFIG
>>>>>> --define-variable=libdir=\$libdir --variable=pluginsdir libtizcore`])
>>>>>> +AC_SUBST([OMX_TIZONIA_LIB_INSTALL_DIR])
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> dnl Directory for VA libs
>>>>>> AC_ARG_WITH([va-libdir],
>>>>>> @@ -2840,6 +2874,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/glx/xlib/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/omx_bellagio/Makefile
>>>>>> + src/gallium/state_trackers/omx_tizonia/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/osmesa/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/va/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/state_trackers/vdpau/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -2850,6 +2885,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/dri/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/libgl-xlib/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/omx-bellagio/Makefile
>>>>>> + src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/opencl/Makefile
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/opencl/mesa.icd
>>>>>> src/gallium/targets/osmesa/Makefile
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/Makefile.am b/src/gallium/Makefile.am
>>>>>> index 2b930ac..e17c679 100644
>>>>>> --- a/src/gallium/Makefile.am
>>>>>> +++ b/src/gallium/Makefile.am
>>>>>> @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ if HAVE_ST_OMX_BELLAGIO
>>>>>> SUBDIRS += state_trackers/omx_bellagio targets/omx-bellagio
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>> +if HAVE_ST_OMX_TIZONIA
>>>>>> +SUBDIRS += state_trackers/omx_tizonia targets/omx-tizonia
>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So now we have 2 OMX ST under gallium state trackers
>>>>>
>>>>> Is possible that we could have both tizonia and bellagio as
>>>>> sub-directory under st/omx?, so that they could share the same Makefile.am,
>>>>> Makefile.source, and entrypoint.[ch] etc.
>>>>> even maybe same idea for gallium/target?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Leo
>>>>>
>>>>> The original plan was to completely replace the existing OMX IL ST
>>>> however porting wasn't that straightforward since the new OMX IL version
>>>> breaks backward compatibility.
>>>> I think Julien will be able to expain better here.
>>>>
>>>> So the plan is still to replace the ST but for now we've postponed that
>>>> task until all the components have been ported. As it is now we'll later
>>>> just remove omx_bellagio and rename omx_tizonia to omx.
>>>> I think that merging them both will make the transition a little bit
>>>> harder.
>>>>
>>>> So maybe if you still insist can we mark it as good-to-have for later?
>>>> Actually Julien gave the same idea earlier when we started on the project
>>>> and decided to postpone it for later due to project time restraints.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> if HAVE_GALLIUM_OSMESA
>>>>>> SUBDIRS += state_trackers/osmesa targets/osmesa
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile.am
>>>>>> b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile.am
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..6baacaa
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/Makefile.am
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
>>>>>> +include $(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/Automake.inc
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +AM_CFLAGS = \
>>>>>> + $(GALLIUM_TARGET_CFLAGS)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +omxdir = $(OMX_TIZONIA_LIB_INSTALL_DIR)
>>>>>> +omx_LTLIBRARIES = libomxtiz_mesa.la
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +nodist_EXTRA_libomxtiz_mesa_la_SOURCES = dummy.cpp
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_SOURCES =
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LDFLAGS = \
>>>>>> + -shared \
>>>>>> + -module \
>>>>>> + -no-undefined \
>>>>>> + -avoid-version \
>>>>>> + $(GC_SECTIONS) \
>>>>>> + $(LD_NO_UNDEFINED)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +if HAVE_LD_VERSION_SCRIPT
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LDFLAGS += \
>>>>>> + -Wl,--version-script=$(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/targets/omx-
>>>>>> tizonia/omx.sym
>>>>>> +endif # HAVE_LD_VERSION_SCRIPT
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LIBADD = \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/state_trackers/omx_tizonia/libo
>>>>>> mxtiztracker.la \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/auxiliary/libgalliumvlwinsys.la \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/auxiliary/libgalliumvl.la \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/auxiliary/libgallium.la \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/util/libmesautil.la \
>>>>>> + $(OMX_TIZONIA_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(OMX_TIZILHEADERS_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(OMX_TIZPLATFORM_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(LIBDRM_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(GALLIUM_COMMON_LIB_DEPS)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +if HAVE_PLATFORM_X11
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LIBADD += \
>>>>>> + $(VL_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(XCB_DRI3_LIBS)
>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +EXTRA_libomxtiz_mesa_la_DEPENDENCIES = omx.sym
>>>>>> +EXTRA_DIST = omx.sym
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +if HAVE_GALLIUM_STATIC_TARGETS
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +TARGET_DRIVERS =
>>>>>> +TARGET_CPPFLAGS =
>>>>>> +TARGET_LIB_DEPS =
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +include $(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Automake.inc
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +include $(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/drivers/r600/Automake.inc
>>>>>> +include $(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/Automake.inc
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_SOURCES += target.c
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_CPPFLAGS = $(TARGET_CPPFLAGS)
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LIBADD += \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/libpipe_l
>>>>>> oader_static.la \
>>>>>> + $(GALLIUM_PIPE_LOADER_WINSYS_LIBS) \
>>>>>> + $(TARGET_LIB_DEPS) \
>>>>>> + $(TARGET_COMPILER_LIB_DEPS) \
>>>>>> + $(TARGET_RADEON_WINSYS) $(TARGET_RADEON_COMMON)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +else # HAVE_GALLIUM_STATIC_TARGETS
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LIBADD += \
>>>>>> + $(top_builddir)/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/libpipe_l
>>>>>> oader_dynamic.la
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +endif # HAVE_GALLIUM_STATIC_TARGETS
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +if HAVE_GALLIUM_LLVM
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LIBADD += $(LLVM_LIBS)
>>>>>> +libomxtiz_mesa_la_LDFLAGS += $(LLVM_LDFLAGS)
>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/omx.sym
>>>>>> b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/omx.sym
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..2aafb29
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/omx.sym
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + global:
>>>>>> + OMX_ComponentInit;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # Workaround for an LLVM warning with
>>>>>> -simplifycfg-sink-common
>>>>>> + # due to LLVM being initialized multiple times.
>>>>>> + radeon_drm_winsys_create;
>>>>>> + amdgpu_winsys_create;
>>>>>> + local:
>>>>>> + *;
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/target.c
>>>>>> b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/target.c
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..308e23b
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/src/gallium/targets/omx-tizonia/target.c
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>>>>>> +#include "target-helpers/drm_helper.h"
>>>>>> +#include "target-helpers/sw_helper.h"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170815/7d561fb7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list