[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] i965: Use ISL for emitting null surface states.
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Sat Aug 19 06:14:43 UTC 2017
On Friday, August 18, 2017 10:05:46 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We handle the Sandybridge multisampled 2D surface hack here, rather
> > than in ISL, because it requires allocating a BO, and is kind of messy.
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/Makefile.sources | 2 -
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c | 4 +-
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.h | 5 -
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state.h | 8 -
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 119 ++++++--------
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c | 180
> > ----------------------
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen8_surface_state.c | 82 ----------
> > 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 351 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Look at that diffstat. :-)
Indeed! Deleting copyright headers / files saves quite a few lines :)
> Not really sure why you felt the need to drop the brw_ I don't really care
> that much though.
Mesa style is to skip _mesa_ prefixes on static functions. I usually
try to follow that convention for brw_ prefixes too. I guess I thought
about it as unifying {brw,gen7,gen8}_emit_null_surface_state into a
single function, which I named simply emit_null_surface_state.
But you're right, in the diff it looks funny and unrelated. It's not
really necessary either. *shrug*
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170818/224a9de8/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list