[Mesa-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/4] driconf: add new force_compat_profile option

[Edmondo Tommasina]

On Feb 14, 2017 11:50 AM, "Marek Olšák" <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:



On Feb 14, 2017 4:11 AM, "Michel Dänzer" <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:

On 14/02/17 09:28 AM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 11:43 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>>> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 02/13/2017 04:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
>>>>> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/10/2017 10:05 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10 February 2017 at 21:04, Emil Velikov
>>>>>>> <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10 February 2017 at 13:41, Samuel Pitoiset
>>>>>>>> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mesa currently doesn't allow to create 3.1+ compatibility profiles
>>>>>>>>> mainly because various features are unimplemented and bugs can
>>>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However, some buggy apps request a compat profile without using
>>>>>>>>> any old features but they fail to start because Mesa clamps the
>>>>>>>>> GLSL version to 130 for compat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Afaict this statement matches the implementation, yet both
>>>>>>>> differ from
>>>>>>>> the override name.
>>>>>>>> The implementation below is "force_glsl_compat_version".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it's not unreasonable to have both -
>>>>>>>> force_compat_profile and
>>>>>>>> force_glsl_compat_version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> s/force_glsl_compat_version/do_not_cap_glsl_compat_version/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would prefer force_glsl_compat_version.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch really enables compat profiles higher than 3.0. The
>>>>> GLSLVersion check reduces the GLSL version, which in turn reduces the
>>>>> GL version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, force_compat_profile as I suggested initially makes more sense
>>>> to you?
>>>
>>> Sort of. It doesn't really force a compat profile. It only allows
>>> higher GL versions for compat profiles.
>>>
>>> Marek
>>
>> You have my Rb whether or not you change the name.
>
> Thanks Marek.
>
> If I have no strong objections, I think I will push this series as-is in
> the next few days.

FWIW, I agree with others that "force_compat_profile" seems quite
misleading and confusing. I don't have a better suggestion though.


"lift_compat_version_limit"?


"ignore_compat_version_limit"

"allow_higher_compat_version"?

edmondo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170214/16c6caa4/attachment.html>