[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nir/gcm: fix a bug with metadata handling
Connor Abbott
cwabbott0 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 14 23:12:08 UTC 2017
We were using impl->num_blocks, but that isn't guaranteed to be
up-to-date until after the block_index metadata is required. If we were
unlucky, this could lead to overwriting memory.
Noticed by inspection.
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0 at gmail.com>
---
src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_gcm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_gcm.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_gcm.c
index cff2315..879a77a 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_gcm.c
+++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_gcm.c
@@ -456,6 +456,9 @@ gcm_place_instr(nir_instr *instr, struct gcm_state *state)
static bool
opt_gcm_impl(nir_function_impl *impl, bool value_number)
{
+ nir_metadata_require(impl, nir_metadata_block_index |
+ nir_metadata_dominance);
+
struct gcm_state state;
state.impl = impl;
@@ -463,9 +466,6 @@ opt_gcm_impl(nir_function_impl *impl, bool value_number)
exec_list_make_empty(&state.instrs);
state.blocks = rzalloc_array(NULL, struct gcm_block_info, impl->num_blocks);
- nir_metadata_require(impl, nir_metadata_block_index |
- nir_metadata_dominance);
-
gcm_build_block_info(&impl->body, &state, 0);
nir_foreach_block(block, impl) {
--
2.5.5
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list