[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] r600g: add support for optionally using non-IEEE mul ops
Nicolai Hähnle
nhaehnle at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 09:20:26 UTC 2017
The series looks reasonable to me, so
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>
Please hold off on pushing this for a day or so, to give me or someone
else a chance to test this.
On 24.01.2017 03:18, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
> ---
>
> Untested. Can be verified with Xnine. It should pass before 1/2 of this series,
> start failing with it, and pass again with 2/2 in place.
>
> src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.c | 2 +-
> src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.c b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.c
> index 98ceebf..d126d37 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ static int r600_get_param(struct pipe_screen* pscreen, enum pipe_cap param)
> case PIPE_CAP_FRAMEBUFFER_NO_ATTACHMENT:
> case PIPE_CAP_POLYGON_OFFSET_UNITS_UNSCALED:
> case PIPE_CAP_CLEAR_TEXTURE:
> + case PIPE_CAP_TGSI_MUL_ZERO_WINS:
> return 1;
>
> case PIPE_CAP_DEVICE_RESET_STATUS_QUERY:
> @@ -378,7 +379,6 @@ static int r600_get_param(struct pipe_screen* pscreen, enum pipe_cap param)
> case PIPE_CAP_NATIVE_FENCE_FD:
> case PIPE_CAP_GLSL_OPTIMIZE_CONSERVATIVELY:
> case PIPE_CAP_TGSI_FS_FBFETCH:
> - case PIPE_CAP_TGSI_MUL_ZERO_WINS:
> return 0;
>
> case PIPE_CAP_MAX_SHADER_PATCH_VARYINGS:
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> index 0114f8f..b692e7f 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> @@ -3906,6 +3906,11 @@ static int tgsi_op2_s(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx, int swap, int trans_only)
> int i, j, r, lasti = tgsi_last_instruction(write_mask);
> /* use temp register if trans_only and more than one dst component */
> int use_tmp = trans_only && (write_mask ^ (1 << lasti));
> + unsigned op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> +
> + if (op == ALU_OP2_MUL_IEEE &&
> + ctx->info.properties[TGSI_PROPERTY_MUL_ZERO_WINS])
> + op = ALU_OP2_MUL;
>
> for (i = 0; i <= lasti; i++) {
> if (!(write_mask & (1 << i)))
> @@ -3919,7 +3924,7 @@ static int tgsi_op2_s(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx, int swap, int trans_only)
> } else
> tgsi_dst(ctx, &inst->Dst[0], i, &alu.dst);
>
> - alu.op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> + alu.op = op;
> if (!swap) {
> for (j = 0; j < inst->Instruction.NumSrcRegs; j++) {
> r600_bytecode_src(&alu.src[j], &ctx->src[j], i);
> @@ -6543,6 +6548,11 @@ static int tgsi_op3(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx)
> int i, j, r;
> int lasti = tgsi_last_instruction(inst->Dst[0].Register.WriteMask);
> int temp_regs[4];
> + unsigned op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> +
> + if (op == ALU_OP3_MULADD_IEEE &&
> + ctx->info.properties[TGSI_PROPERTY_MUL_ZERO_WINS])
> + op = ALU_OP3_MULADD;
>
> for (j = 0; j < inst->Instruction.NumSrcRegs; j++) {
> temp_regs[j] = 0;
> @@ -6554,7 +6564,7 @@ static int tgsi_op3(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx)
> continue;
>
> memset(&alu, 0, sizeof(struct r600_bytecode_alu));
> - alu.op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> + alu.op = op;
> for (j = 0; j < inst->Instruction.NumSrcRegs; j++) {
> r = tgsi_make_src_for_op3(ctx, temp_regs[j], i, &alu.src[j], &ctx->src[j]);
> if (r)
> @@ -6580,10 +6590,14 @@ static int tgsi_dp(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx)
> struct tgsi_full_instruction *inst = &ctx->parse.FullToken.FullInstruction;
> struct r600_bytecode_alu alu;
> int i, j, r;
> + unsigned op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> + if (op == ALU_OP2_DOT4_IEEE &&
> + ctx->info.properties[TGSI_PROPERTY_MUL_ZERO_WINS])
> + op = ALU_OP2_DOT4;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> memset(&alu, 0, sizeof(struct r600_bytecode_alu));
> - alu.op = ctx->inst_info->op;
> + alu.op = op;
> for (j = 0; j < inst->Instruction.NumSrcRegs; j++) {
> r600_bytecode_src(&alu.src[j], &ctx->src[j], i);
> }
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list