[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: perf: use new subslices numbers from device info
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Thu Jul 6 08:51:59 UTC 2017
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_query.c | 49 ++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_query.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_query.c
index 81389dbd3e3..d1e84506123 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_query.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_query.c
@@ -1826,26 +1826,25 @@ init_oa_sys_vars(struct brw_context *brw, const char *sysfs_dev_dir)
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.gt_min_freq = min_freq_mhz * 1000000;
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.gt_max_freq = max_freq_mhz * 1000000;
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.timestamp_frequency = devinfo->timestamp_frequency;
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_slices = devinfo->num_slices;
+ /* Assuming uniform distribution of subslices per slices. */
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_sub_slices = devinfo->num_subslices[0];
if (devinfo->is_haswell) {
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.slice_mask = 0;
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.subslice_mask = 0;
+
+ for (int s = 0; s < devinfo->num_slices; s++)
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.slice_mask |= 1U << s;
+ for (int ss = 0; ss < devinfo->num_subslices[0]; ss++)
+ brw->perfquery.sys_vars.subslice_mask |= 1U << ss;
+
if (devinfo->gt == 1) {
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eus = 10;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_slices = 1;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_sub_slices = 1;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.slice_mask = 0x1;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.subslice_mask = 0x1;
} else if (devinfo->gt == 2) {
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eus = 20;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_slices = 1;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_sub_slices = 2;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.slice_mask = 0x1;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.subslice_mask = 0x3;
} else if (devinfo->gt == 3) {
brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eus = 40;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_slices = 2;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.n_eu_sub_slices = 2;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.slice_mask = 0x3;
- brw->perfquery.sys_vars.subslice_mask = 0xf;
} else
unreachable("not reached");
} else {
@@ -1855,29 +1854,15 @@ init_oa_sys_vars(struct brw_context *brw, const char *sysfs_dev_dir)
int n_eus = 0;
int slice_mask = 0;
int ss_mask = 0;
- int s_max = devinfo->num_slices; /* maximum number of slices */
- int ss_max = 0; /* maximum number of subslices per slice */
+ /* maximum number of slices */
+ int s_max = devinfo->num_slices;
+ /* maximum number of subslices per slice (assuming uniform subslices per
+ * slices)
+ */
+ int ss_max = devinfo->num_subslices[0];
uint64_t subslice_mask = 0;
int s;
- if (devinfo->gen == 8) {
- if (devinfo->gt == 1) {
- ss_max = 2;
- } else {
- ss_max = 3;
- }
- } else if (devinfo->gen == 9) {
- /* XXX: beware that the kernel (as of writing) actually works as if
- * ss_max == 4 since the HW register that reports the global subslice
- * mask has 4 bits while in practice the limit is 3. It's also
- * important that we initialize $SubsliceMask with 3 bits per slice
- * since that's what the counter availability expressions in XML
- * expect.
- */
- ss_max = 3;
- } else
- return false;
-
gp.param = I915_PARAM_EU_TOTAL;
gp.value = &n_eus;
ret = drmIoctl(screen->fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp);
--
2.13.2
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list