[Mesa-dev] [RFC] glx: Prefer library path given by pkgconfig over the system

[Grazvydas Ignotas]

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Pohjolainen, Topi
<topi.pohjolainen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:45:22PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 20 March 2017 at 10:27, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Topi Pohjolainen
>> > <topi.pohjolainen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Recent change to use drmGetDevices2() made me realize that
>> >> build configured using
>> >>
>> >> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=my_drm_lib_path/pkgconfig ./autogen.sh
>> >>
>> >> considers the libdrm path gotten from pkgconfig only during
>> >> make. When invoking "make install" the relink command puts
>> >> system library ahead of the path gotten from pkgconfig
>> >> (and starts to fail as system libdrm isn't new enough).
>> >>
>> >> This change forces the relink command to respect pkgconfig
>> >> settings.
>> >
>> > Nice, this issue is really annoying, and using Emil's workarounds from
>> > bug 100259 is cumbersome.
>> Indeed they are - too many bugs to get around to sorting libtool, I'm afraid :-\
>>
>> > Tested-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas at gmail.com>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> It looks to me that in
>> >>
>> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
>> >>
>> >> Emil et al are discussing similar case with gbm.
>> >>
>> >> CC: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com>
>> >> CC: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen at intel.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  src/glx/Makefile.am | 1 +
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/src/glx/Makefile.am b/src/glx/Makefile.am
>> >> index 79d416a..ced5227 100644
>> >> --- a/src/glx/Makefile.am
>> >> +++ b/src/glx/Makefile.am
>> >> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ GL_LIB_VERSION=1:2
>> >>  endif
>> >>
>> >>  GL_LIBS = \
>> >> +       $(LIBDRM_LIBS) \
>> If we are to do this, please add a comment - "HACK" or "W/A" with why
>> we need it/how it works.
>> This way we can purge it in a few months as distros catch up ;-)
>
> Shouldn't there be something of this sort in general? Build system should
> respect the configuration gotten from pkgconfig, right?
>
> And isn't libdrm upstream almost always ahead of distros. Once distros reach
> 2.4.75 libdrm, upstream is likely to have moved forward, don't you think?
>
> I can keep this patch in my private tree to make it work for me in case there
> aren't other people needing it.

If I wasn't clear enough, there is at least one person.

Gražvydas