[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/6] glx: Move vertex array protocol state into the indirect backend
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Tue Nov 14 21:15:45 UTC 2017
On 11/14/2017 12:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Only relevant for indirect contexts, so let's get that code out of the
> common path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> ---
> src/glx/glxcurrent.c | 12 ------------
> src/glx/indirect_glx.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/glx/glxcurrent.c b/src/glx/glxcurrent.c
> index fd04929b89..9f8bf7cee1 100644
> --- a/src/glx/glxcurrent.c
> +++ b/src/glx/glxcurrent.c
> @@ -238,18 +238,6 @@ MakeContextCurrent(Display * dpy, GLXDrawable draw,
>
> __glXUnlock();
>
> - /* The indirect vertex array state must to be initialised after we
> - * have setup the context, as it needs to query server attributes.
> - */
> - if (gc && !gc->isDirect) {
> - __GLXattribute *state = gc->client_state_private;
> - if (state && state->array_state == NULL) {
> - glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS);
> - glGetString(GL_VERSION);
> - __glXInitVertexArrayState(gc);
> - }
> - }
> -
> return GL_TRUE;
> }
>
> diff --git a/src/glx/indirect_glx.c b/src/glx/indirect_glx.c
> index cfae12f6c0..b552b5768a 100644
> --- a/src/glx/indirect_glx.c
> +++ b/src/glx/indirect_glx.c
> @@ -148,9 +148,21 @@ indirect_bind_context(struct glx_context *gc, struct glx_context *old,
> sent = SendMakeCurrentRequest(dpy, gc->xid, tag, draw, read,
> &gc->currentContextTag);
>
> - if (!IndirectAPI)
> - IndirectAPI = __glXNewIndirectAPI();
> - _glapi_set_dispatch(IndirectAPI);
> + if (sent) {
> + if (!IndirectAPI)
> + IndirectAPI = __glXNewIndirectAPI();
> + _glapi_set_dispatch(IndirectAPI);
> +
> + /* The indirect vertex array state must to be initialised after we
> + * have setup the context, as it needs to query server attributes.
> + */
> + __GLXattribute *state = gc->client_state_private;
> + if (state && state->array_state == NULL) {
> + glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS);
> + glGetString(GL_VERSION);
> + __glXInitVertexArrayState(gc);
> + }
> + }
This is where this code used to be, but commit d57c85c1 moved it. Does
this not re-regress things? I guess wrapping it in 'if (sent)' seems
like it ought to be enough to prevent the original problem.
>
> return !sent;
> }
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list