[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] egl: add dri2_egl_surface_free_outdated_buffers_and_update_size() helper (v2)

Gurchetan Singh gurchetansingh at chromium.org
Thu Oct 19 21:18:09 UTC 2017


De-duplicating and then trimming down works for me.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 18 October 2017 at 23:36, Gurchetan Singh
> <gurchetansingh at chromium.org> wrote:
> >> Then again, I'd suggest keeping that as separate series. These patches
> >> started as a way to minimise the duplication we have in drivers/dri2.
> >
> > I'm fine with dri2_$action_$object.  We can modify the existing functions
> > later, but I recommend adopting more concise conventions in this
> patchset,
> > i.e:
> >
> > dri2_egl_surface_record_buffers_and_update_back_buffer -->
> > dri2_set_back_buffer_surface
> > dri2_egl_surface_free_outdated_buffers_and_update_size -->
> > dri2_fixup_surface
> > dri2_egl_surface_update_buffer_age --> dri2_update_age_surface
> > dri2_egl_surface_get_image_front --> dri2_get_front_image_surface
> >
> Sure thing, let's use consistent names with this series.
>
> >> goal the series is to a) remove a handful of the ifdef spaghetti and
> >
> > I agree, struct dri2_egl_surface can be refactored. I would advocate a
> > solution where the surface (a) has everything a platform needs but
> nothing
> > else (b) has a minimal amount of duplication.  I would like to look at
> the
> > struct and see if it defines buffers[5], it must mean the platform
> > implements get_buffers_with_format for example.  If a platform doesn't
> > define color_buffers, it means EXT_buffer_age is not used for whatever
> > reason.  Everything has dri_image_front -- then everything must use the
> > image extension.  I think this type of self-consistency is useful, from a
> > code is documentation point of view.  Here's pseudo-code of what I would
> > want:
> >
> I agreed with the goals but I would swap the order/priority -
> de-duplicate, then trim down.
> By de-duplicating/refactoring one could add support for X/Y fairly
> easily. Once all that is done, we can polish ;-)
>
> I fear that otherwise there will be a lot of unnecessary churn.
>
> Thanks
> Emil
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20171019/7cd08980/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list