[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] spirv: convert the offset and count operands for bitfield ops to uint32

Jason Ekstrand jason at jlekstrand.net
Mon Apr 30 18:51:18 UTC 2018


On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:46 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <
siglesias at igalia.com> wrote:

> On 26/04/18 18:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:24 AM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <
> siglesias at igalia.com> wrote:
>
>> SPIR-V allows to define the shift operand for shift opcodes with
>> a bit-size different than 32 bits, but in NIR the opcodes have
>> that limitation. As agreed in the mailing list, this patch adds
>> a conversion to 32 bits to fix this.
>>
>> For more info, see:
>>
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2018-April/193026.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias at igalia.com>
>> ---
>>  src/compiler/spirv/vtn_alu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_alu.c b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_alu.c
>> index 6f3b82cd5c3..a1654b20273 100644
>> --- a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_alu.c
>> +++ b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_alu.c
>> @@ -640,6 +640,54 @@ vtn_handle_alu(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode,
>>        break;
>>     }
>>
>> +   case SpvOpBitFieldInsert: {
>> +      if (src[2]->bit_size != 32) {
>> +         /* Convert the Shift operand to 32 bits, which is the bitsize
>> +          * supported by the NIR instruction. See discussion here:
>> +          *
>> +          * https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2018-April/1
>> 93026.html
>> +          */
>> +         src[2] = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, nir_op_u2u32, src[2], NULL,
>> NULL, NULL);
>> +      }
>> +      if (src[3]->bit_size != 32) {
>> +         /* Convert the Shift operand to 32 bits, which is the bitsize
>> +          * supported by the NIR instruction. See discussion here:
>> +          *
>> +          * https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2018-April/1
>> 93026.html
>> +          */
>> +         src[3] = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, nir_op_u2u32, src[3], NULL,
>> NULL, NULL);
>> +      }
>> +      val->ssa->def = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, nir_op_bitfield_insert,
>> src[0], src[1], src[2], src[3]);
>>
>
> Just use nir_bitfield_insert here
>
>
>> +      break;
>> +   }
>> +
>> +   case SpvOpBitFieldSExtract:
>> +   case SpvOpBitFieldUExtract: {
>> +      bool swap;
>> +      unsigned src_bit_size = glsl_get_bit_size(vtn_src[0]->type);
>> +      unsigned dst_bit_size = glsl_get_bit_size(type);
>> +      nir_op op = vtn_nir_alu_op_for_spirv_opcode(b, opcode, &swap,
>> +                                                  src_bit_size,
>> dst_bit_size);
>> +      if (src[1]->bit_size != 32) {
>> +         /* Convert the Shift operand to 32 bits, which is the bitsize
>> +          * supported by the NIR instruction. See discussion here:
>> +          *
>> +          * https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2018-April/1
>> 93026.html
>> +          */
>> +         src[1] = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, nir_op_u2u32, src[1], NULL,
>> NULL, NULL);
>> +      }
>> +      if (src[2]->bit_size != 32) {
>> +         /* Convert the Shift operand to 32 bits, which is the bitsize
>> +          * supported by the NIR instruction. See discussion here:
>> +          *
>> +          * https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2018-April/1
>> 93026.html
>> +          */
>> +         src[2] = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, nir_op_u2u32, src[2], NULL,
>> NULL, NULL);
>> +      }
>> +      val->ssa->def = nir_build_alu(&b->nb, op, src[0], src[1], src[2],
>> src[3]);
>> +      break;
>>
>
> I'm wondering if we don't want to just do something such as
>
> for (unsigned i = 0; i < nir_op_infos[op].num_inputs; i++) {
>    src_bit_size = nir_alu_type_get_get_type_size(nir_op_infos[op].input_
> types[i]);
>    if (src_bit_size && src_bit_size != src[i]->bit_size) {
>       /* Comment goes here */
>       assert(src_bit_size == 32);
>       assert(op == nir_op_ushr || op == ...);
>       src[i] = nir_u2u32(&b->nb, src[i]);
>    }
> }
>
> And then we can cover all of these cases in one go.
>
>
>
> Right, but I don't want to convert all of them. The starting value for the
> loop counter should be 1 for some ops and 2 for others, so we don't convert
> the operand that has the value that we will operate.
>

I believe the sources you don't want to convert will have src_bit_size == 0.

--Jason


> I'm going to write a patch for that. Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> Sam
>
> +   }
>> +
>>     case SpvOpShiftLeftLogical:
>>     case SpvOpShiftRightArithmetic:
>>     case SpvOpShiftRightLogical: {
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20180430/cad3b3ed/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list