[Mesa-dev] [Bug 92552] [softpipe] piglit egl-create-context-valid-flag-forward-compatible-gl regression

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Oct 11 11:46:20 UTC 2018


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92552

--- Comment #12 from asimiklit <andrey.simiklit at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Ian Romanick from comment #9)
> Comment on attachment 119006 [details] [review]
> egl: distnguish between unsupported api vs capabilities for EGL_CONTEXT_FLAGS
> 
> Review of attachment 119006 [details] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are a few things wrong with this patch.  First, you can't check the
> version when you see EGL_CONTEXT_FLAGS in the attribs list because the
> application could specify the requested version after flags.  This should
> not generate an error:
> 
>     EGL_CONTEXT_FLAGS, EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_FORWARD_COMPATIBLE_BIT_KHR,
>     EGL_CONTEXT_CLIENT_VERSION, 3,
>     0
> 
> Second, it is not correct to generate EGL_BAD_MATCH for
> EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_ROBUST_ACCESS_BIT_KHR when
> EGL_EXT_create_context_robustness is not supported.  Think of it this way...
> if we deleted all support and knowledge of
> EGL_EXT_create_context_robustness, what error would be generated?  Default
> case in the switch statement says EGL_BAD_ATTRIBUTE.

I suggest to improve this test in the following way:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/256081/

(In reply to Vinson Lee from comment #11)
> mesa: 1e8435ce0cce671024ebf9c5465ea8bdcb563b69 (master 11.3.0-devel)
> This regression is still present.

The possible mesa fix was suggested:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/256063/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20181011/14044fc4/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list