[Mesa-dev] Is it time to stop using the mailing list for patch review?
Timothy Arceri
tarceri at itsqueeze.com
Tue Dec 10 23:00:34 UTC 2019
On 11/12/19 5:58 am, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 12/10/19 12:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I think its time we discussed whether we're going to continue to do
>>> patch review
>>> on the mailing list, or if it it should all go through gitlab. I
>>> think we should
>>> stop using the mailing list, here are some reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) Most development is happening on gitlab at this point, patches on
>>> the mailing
>>> list are often overlooked
>>> 2) The mailing list bypasses CI which potentially breaks the build
>>> 3) Probably more reasons I'm forgetting.
>>
>> I think effectively we're already there.
>>
>> What concrete change would you propose?
>
> Removing mention of the mailing list from documentation would be nice.
> Also, currently the README implies that the mailing list is not only
> acceptable but preferred: "Note that Mesa uses email mailing-lists for
> patches submission, review and discussions."
I've sent a merge request:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3045
>
> Relatedly, is GitLab preferred also for piglit? The HACKING file there
> also specifically prescribes using the mailing list, but I've noticed
> that patches submitted to the mailing list by myself and another new
> contributor have gone unreviewed for several weeks.
Yes we should update the piglit docs also.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list