[Mesa-dev] Thoughts after hitting 100 merge requests?
Tapani Pälli
tapani.palli at intel.com
Thu Jan 17 11:39:50 UTC 2019
On 1/17/19 12:32 PM, apinheiro wrote:
>
> On 17/1/19 9:39, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 11:38:05 PM PST Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 10:57 -0600, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> The mesa project has now hit 100 merge requests (36 are still open).
>>>> I (and I'm sure others) would be curious to hear people's initial
>>>> thoughts on the process. What's working well? What's not working?
>>>> Is it total fail and should we go back to mailing lists?
>>>>
>>> So, overall I think it works pretty well. I have some things I think
>>> maybe we could do better, some of which has already been pointed out:
>>>
>>> 1. New MRs should probably get their cover-letter automatically sent to
>>> the mailing list for incrased visibility.
>>>
>>> 2. Perhaps we should ban sending MRs from the main mesa repo? With
>>> gitlab, it's trivial to make your own fork, and you can delegate
>>> permissions to other users for collaborators. I don't think there's any
>>> reason to clutter up the main mesa repo with all kinds of branches. But
>>> it seems some people send their MRs from the main-repo anyway. Perhaps
>>> we should document that this isn't how to send MRs?
>> I agree, I would much rather see MRs sent from personal forks.
>> That's what I've been doing, and it works well. If you see people
>> doing that, feel free to say something - I assume they just don't
>> realize they can do that.
>
>
> As one of the people doing it wrongly (using a branch of the main repo,
> instead of a personal fork): yes please, let's document that, as I was
> unaware that was a problem.
>
> What Im not sure if it is possible to update a existing MR in order to
> use a different repo/branch. If that is not possible, should I close my
> MR and reopen it with a fork?
>
I guess it's not a big deal (?) if we just take care of proper cleanup
(can be done via checkbox while merging). For me this happened by
accident (with recent ahw-fix branch), I just happen to have remote
names 'gitlab' and 'gitlab-tpalli' so it got pushed to the wrong one.
// Tapani
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list