[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeon uvd add uvd fw version for amdgpu
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 15:15:07 UTC 2016
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Jiang, Sonny <Sonny.Jiang at amd.com> wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
>
> Are you Okay with these?
Without these patches UVD won't work on Polaris.
Alex
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sonny
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jiang, Sonny
> Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 5:33:29 PM
> To: Christian König; Emil Velikov
> Cc: 12.0; mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] radeon uvd add uvd fw version
> for amdgpu
>
>
> Hi Emil,
>
>
> I have added comments for each patch, and applied for branch 12.0.
>
> Please find attached patches.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sonny
>
> ________________________________
> From: mesa-dev <mesa-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of
> Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 8:07:51 AM
> To: Emil Velikov
> Cc: Jiang, Sonny; 12.0; mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] radeon uvd add uvd fw version
> for amdgpu
>
> Am 01.07.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Emil Velikov:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On 29 June 2016 at 20:20, Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>>> Am 29.06.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: sonjiang <sonny.jiang at amd.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: sonjiang <sonny.jiang at amd.com>
>>>>> Cc: "12.0" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org>
>>>> For the series:
>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> as well.
>>>
>> Here we have three patches, suggesting a bug with absolutely no
>> information what the issue is and/or why this approach is correct.
>>
>> I'm sorry to say this, but as is, this series is not landing in
>> stable. Sonjiang, being the author of these please reply with a brief
>> justification why we want those. Before doing so I would strongly
>> recommend reading this [1] blog post.
>
> Well to put a carrot on the front of your stick: I asked what the
> firmware version patch is all about internally as well when I've seen
> those patches. So it would have even made our internal review much
> easier if Sonny added a commit message in the first place.
>
> My fault to not requesting that his answer is put as a commit message on
> the patches.
>
> On the other hand this is for Polaris, we had time pressure to get it
> out of the door and today is a public holiday in Canada. So you probably
> won't get updated message before Monday.
>
> Is that soon enough? Otherwise UVD will be broken on Polaris in the
> stable branch.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Emil
>>
>> [1] http://who-t.blogspot.co.uk/2009/12/on-commit-messages.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list