[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] disk_cache: reduce default cache size to 5% of filesystem

[Timothy Arceri]

On 27/04/17 16:47, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27/04/17 10:15 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>> Modern disks are extremely large and are only going to get bigger.
>> Usage has shown frequent Mesa upgrades can result in the cache
>> growing very fast i.e. wasting a lot of disk space unnecessarily.
>>
>> 5% seems like a more reasonable default.
>>
>> Cc: "17.1" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org>
>> ---
>>   src/util/disk_cache.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/util/disk_cache.c b/src/util/disk_cache.c
>> index d9de8ef..9fd7b96 100644
>> --- a/src/util/disk_cache.c
>> +++ b/src/util/disk_cache.c
>> @@ -324,24 +324,24 @@ disk_cache_create(const char *gpu_name, const char *timestamp)
>>            case '\0':
>>            case 'G':
>>            case 'g':
>>            default:
>>               max_size *= 1024*1024*1024;
>>               break;
>>            }
>>         }
>>      }
>>   
>> -   /* Default to 1GB or 10% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
>> +   /* Default to 1GB or 5% of filesystem for maximum cache size. */
>>      if (max_size == 0) {
>>         statvfs(path, &vfs);
>> -      max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 10);
>> +      max_size = MAX2(1024*1024*1024, vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_bsize / 20);
>>      }
> 
> 5% can still be quite a lot (what if every library on the system tried
> using that much for itself?). How about 1%?

I've pushed these two patches for now.

> 
> Anyway, this is a step in the right direction, so
> 
> Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
> 
>