[PATCH 2/2] dell: removed ID_MM_TELIT_PORTS_TAGGED dependency

[Aleksander Morgado]

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Carlo Lobrano <c.lobrano at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking at the actual purpose of the code; it looks like it's for
>> minimizing probing time because Telit modems always reply well to
>> AT+GMI , and that is actually the first command we try... so do we
>> even need that logic there for anything? What happens if you remove
>> the block setting the cgmi_retries and at_retries to 0?
>
>
> Only AT ports reply to AT+GMI, while for the others (5, if I remember
> correctly) we need to try all the commands and the retries and wait for
> timeout to go on.

Wouldn't this happen in the same way for all non-AT ports in modems
managed by the Telit plugin, now that ID_MM_TELIT_PORTS_TAGGED is
removed from the Telit plugin as well?

-- 
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es