aleksander at aleksander.es
Mon Sep 18 16:01:30 UTC 2017
> I overlooked one thing when I revised the patches based on Dan's
> suggestion, and also missed that in my testing :-(
> MMSimMbim:update_modem_unlock_retries() calls
> mm_iface_modem_update_unlock_retries() to report remaining attempts
> PIN1. That won't affect MMBroadbandModemMbimPriv::sim_pin_retries. My
> original approach was to handle all MMUnlockRetries updates via
> If we prefer caching PIN1 retries in MMBroadbandModemMbim,
> MMBroadbandModemMbim needs to provide a method (e.g.
> mm_broadband_modem_mbm_set_sim_pin_retries) for MMSimMbim to propagate
> the information. Would you prefer that or should I go back to my
> original approach?
Probably better to go with the old approach I think; I wouldn't like
MMIfaceModem code to call MMBroadbandModemMbim APIs.
More information about the ModemManager-devel