[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

Olivier Crête olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Wed Jul 2 13:46:03 PDT 2008

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:02 +0300, Kai.Vehmanen at nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
> On 20 June 2008,  Olivier Crête wrote:
> >> Well, you need one per component, so it would have to be 
> >> nice_agent_fallback(agent, streamid, componentid, remote_cand), but 
> >> you also need to select the local candidates I guess. I'm not really 
> >> certain what a nice, simple api would be.
> >
> >What if you have IPv6 and IPv4 local candidates or candidates 
> >on different interfaces, I guess in this case you'd need to 
> >select the local candidate too..
> that's a good point.

Now that I think of it, there is really no point in specifying the local
foundation, libnice should pick the right one all by itself.. And it
would simplify the API too.

Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Collabora Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20080702/94fe4134/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Nice mailing list