[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

[Olivier Crête]

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:02 +0300, Kai.Vehmanen at nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 20 June 2008,  Olivier Crête wrote:
> >> Well, you need one per component, so it would have to be 
> >> nice_agent_fallback(agent, streamid, componentid, remote_cand), but 
> >> you also need to select the local candidates I guess. I'm not really 
> >> certain what a nice, simple api would be.
> >
> >What if you have IPv6 and IPv4 local candidates or candidates 
> >on different interfaces, I guess in this case you'd need to 
> >select the local candidate too..
> 
> that's a good point.

Now that I think of it, there is really no point in specifying the local
foundation, libnice should pick the right one all by itself.. And it
would simplify the API too.

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Collabora Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20080702/94fe4134/attachment.pgp