[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

[Olivier Crête]

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:46 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:02 +0300, Kai.Vehmanen at nokia.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 20 June 2008,  Olivier Crête wrote:
> > >> Well, you need one per component, so it would have to be 
> > >> nice_agent_fallback(agent, streamid, componentid, remote_cand), but 
> > >> you also need to select the local candidates I guess. I'm not really 
> > >> certain what a nice, simple api would be.
> > >
> > >What if you have IPv6 and IPv4 local candidates or candidates 
> > >on different interfaces, I guess in this case you'd need to 
> > >select the local candidate too..
> > 
> > that's a good point.
> 
> Now that I think of it, there is really no point in specifying the local
> foundation, libnice should pick the right one all by itself.. And it
> would simplify the API too.

I have an implementation of this API [1]. I see it replacing the current
set_selected_pair() (at least in farsight), is there any other reason to
keep the full set_selected_pair ?

Also, any comment on the actual code?

[1] http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/tester/nice.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/force-candidate

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Collabora Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20080702/e5938690/attachment.pgp