[ooo-build] StartupNotify=false ...
Jan Holesovsky
kendy at suse.cz
Wed Sep 30 01:57:49 PDT 2009
Hi Michael,
On Monday 21 September 2009, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > AFAIK, Kendy didn't want to link oosplash.bin against
> > libstartup_notification (or what was the library name). He said
> > that it was crappy. It also saved another dependency, so the
> > start was supposed to be faster...
>
> Lets assume that it will break the X-only case: who cares about that
> one ? :-) if you are running with it having a startup notification leak
> is the least of your problems I think. Hopefully it works for G + K3 +
> K4 well enough.
The assumption there was that the X-only splash appears so quickly that we
don't need the startup notification any more ;-) Unfortunately then we
changed the order of fork/execing soffice.bin & showing the splash (fork
immediately, instead of show splash immediately) which might really be
problematic on netbooks...
And as oosplash.bin is X-only, we cannot use the Gnome/KDE[34] code for
startup notification, we have to either use libstartup-notification again, or
re-implement it in in oosplash.bin (IIRC the protocol is trivial).
Will it be OK for Moblin that the notification is taken care of directly in
oosplash.bin, and not in soffice.bin? Another thing, when to send the 'we
are done' signal - when the splash appears [easy], or the OOo window [a bit
harder, because we can get a dialog that needs interaction before we reach
100%]?
Regards,
Kendy
More information about the ooo-build
mailing list