[Openchrome-users] Modular branch

[Thomas Hellström]

Benno Schulenberg wrote:

>Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm not sure but it seems you have a mixed dlloader / old loader
>>installation.
>>    
>>
>
>Possibly.  Any idea what files I would have to delete to repair this?
>Or could it be caused by the use of a hardened gcc?
>  
>
No, I don't think so. I tried for a couple of hours to remove failing 
files but gave up, removed X and reinstalled.

>I've gotten it to work by modifying the ebuild, replacing in 
>programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ the entire content of the via 
>subdir with that of openchrome_modular/src , and copying 
>openchrome_modular/man alongside it.  See the attached log for the 
>first run with this.
>
>It gave "74K / 59 Hz  Frequency is out of range" on the monitor. 
>But after commenting out the HorizSync and VertRefresh lines in 
>xorg.conf, and the Modeline lines too, it worked, producing the 
>usual 1024x768 at 85 Hz.
>  
>
Info from the logs says you had set a virtual size of 1600x1200, and a 
hsync range of
31.5 to 79 kHz in your Xorg.conf. The driver tried to set up a 1600x1200 
mode at 75kHz. Your monitor didn't like it, since it reports a maximum 
hzync of 71 kHz.

>But there is no direct rendering yet, running glxinfo gives:
>
>libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs.
>libGL error: InitDriver failed
>libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
>
>  
>
The DDX driver is set up correctly, but I don't think you have a mesa 
6.4 3D driver installation?

>For now I've reverted back to the 1.30 driver.  Another try tomorrow.
>
>Benno
>  
>

/Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-users/attachments/20051204/9192f801/attachment.html